[NL2-NL10] second nut flush on 4 flush board

    • gggeorgio
      gggeorgio
      Bronze
      Joined: 05.09.2007 Posts: 494
      Blinds: $0.10/$0.25
      6 players
      Converter

      Stack sizes:
      UTG: $19.43
      UTG+1: $16.88
      Hero: $24.45
      Button: $28.55
      SB: $34.14
      BB: $44.98

      Pre-flop: (6 players) Hero is CO with Q:diamond: Q:spade:
      2 folds, [color:#cc0000]Hero raises to $1[/color], 2 folds, BB calls.

      Flop: 2:spade: K:spade: 7:spade: ($2.1, 2 players)
      BB checks, [color:#cc0000]Hero bets $1.7[/color], BB calls.

      Turn: 6:spade: ($5.5, 2 players)
      BB checks, [color:#cc0000]Hero bets $3[/color], BB calls.

      River: 7:diamond: ($11.5, 2 players)
      BB checks, [color:#cc0000]Hero bets $6[/color], [color:#cc0000]BB raises to $18[/color], Hero calls.

      I’m very frustrated with my call on the river, just wasting 12$ since the only possible hands that he’d c/r the river is the ace or a full house…he wouldn’t play the J this way at all. Anyways my question is about whether I should ‘value’ bet the second nut flush on the river, or just check behind, I think checking behind is a better option now that I look at it.
  • 2 replies
    • Tosh5457
      Tosh5457
      Bronze
      Joined: 18.01.2008 Posts: 3,062
      I think it's unlikely he has A :spade: and he could have a flush right on the flop so your value bets with 2nd nuts are fine IMO. Calling his re-raise on the river I don't know... you got pot odds 3:1 and I believe he won't have an A :spade: 1 in 4 times.
    • lokopussy
      lokopussy
      Bronze
      Joined: 19.09.2006 Posts: 6,412
      I check the turn behind sometimes to induce bluffs and because youre not gettin value 2 streets from a worse hand that often. of course against the right opponent its two easy vbets...So my line is cb turn, call or bet river. as played easy fold to the cr.