This site uses cookies to improve your browsing experience. By continuing to browse the website, you accept such cookies. For more details and to change your settings, see our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy. Close

[NL2-NL10] NL25 - OESD + Pair against a bluffer

    • Kknight
      Joined: 30.04.2007 Posts: 374
      No-Limit Hold'em, $0.25 BB (9 handed)

      Hero ($5.35)
      UTG ($10.30)
      UTG+1 ($28.60)
      MP1 ($14.50)
      MP2 ($27.55)
      MP3 ($14.65)
      CO ($24.40)
      Button ($49.20)
      SB ($26.40)

      Preflop: Hero is BB with 6:spade: , 5:club: .
      [color:#666666]6 folds[/color], Button calls $0.25, [color:#666666]1 fold[/color], Hero checks.

      Flop: ($0.60) 7:diamond: , 6:heart: , 4:diamond: [color:#0000FF](2 players)[/color]
      [color:#CC3333]Hero bets $0.5[/color], Button calls $0.50.

      Turn: ($1.60) 9:diamond: [color:#0000FF](2 players)[/color]
      Hero checks, Button checks.

      River: ($1.60) T:diamond: [color:#0000FF](2 players)[/color]
      Hero checks, [color:#CC3333]Button bets $1.25[/color], Hero folds.

      Final Pot: $1.60

      This was my first hand at the table. I hit second pair + an OESD. I figured I'd take a small stab at the pot and if I got called, I'd just play check/fold unimproved. I figured there was no way I could call the river bet on a four flush and four to a straight board with only 4th pair. After I folded he showed his cards...J3o with no diamond. I saw him do this several more times at this table. He likes to bluff dangerous boards and then show the bluff. I didn't have this read at the time, but assuming I did have this read, would you have played the hand any differently?

  • 3 replies