Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] AJo river decision

7 Posts
6 Users
0 Reactions
481 Views

Poker Stars, $3 + $0.40 NL Hold'em Tournament, 10/20 Blinds, 8 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

UTG+1: 2,680
MP1: 1,500
MP2: 1,470
CO: 1,910
BTN: 1,470
SB: 1,380
Hero (BB): 1,500
UTG: 1,590

Pre-Flop: (30) A♥ J♣ dealt to Hero (BB)
4 folds, CO calls 20, BTN raises to 60, SB folds, Hero calls 40, CO calls 40

Flop: (190) 7♥ T♣ 5♦ (3 Players)
Hero checks, CO checks, BTN checks

Turn: (190) A♠ (3 Players)
Hero bets 140, CO calls 140, BTN folds

River: (470) Q♥ (2 Players)
Hero checks, CO bets 180, Hero calls 180

Did i play the hand well? should i've valuebet the river instead of checking? I checked for pot control and bluff induce


6 replies
dangermowse
Joined: 24.10.2010
Poker Player

Bluff to induce v TWO players isn't best policy, I prefer bet-fold river. Tho I probably check call turn anyway.


brazyd
Joined: 04.12.2008
PokerStrategist

Flop and turn are good imo. On the river, lead out with the bet and fold to a raise. I think you have the best hand most of the times and a weaker hand can pay you off here. So bet for value, chances are that he checks down with a weaker hand with which he also might have called.


You line does not make sense to me...

If you are playing for pot control once you hit Top Pair then why call the bet preflop in the firstplace?

If you think villain is raising with better aces and not raising with AT or worse then fold preflop.

If you are sure he is raising with a ton of worse hands then you can even isolate him here.

Pick a side of the fence IMO either fold it pre or play it for value but calling a raise and then
not value betting this river with a made hand is pointless. If you have a solid read that you can
induce a bluff on the river then it is profitable but most passive villains are just going to check
behind with their pockets or whatever hand they would have called your bet with thinking you
were bluffing on the turn or you yourself do not have an ace but a hand their pocket can beat
for example.


_Anonymous_ Topic starter
_Anonymous_

Originally posted by 8979687

You line does not make sense to me... If you are playing for pot control once you hit Top Pair then why call the bet preflop in the firstplace? If you think villain is raising with better aces and not raising with AT or worse then fold preflop. If you are sure he is raising with a ton of worse hands then you can even isolate him here.

I mostly fold this hand as this is a marginal situation.. against "regs" always.. against laggy I might 3bet or call.. against unknowns I sometimes call..

Pick a side of the fence IMO either fold it pre or play it for value but calling a raise and then not value betting this river with a made hand is pointless.

Ok I agree with you.. this is one of those example I said where you might have been correct to say that I tend to play passively in some spots ;)..


The preflop raiser folded on the turn. The CO open-limp/called preflop, which suggests a bad player with a weak range. I would not worry about AK or AQ in his range, since hands like A4 and JT are more likely. I would bet the river for value, probably folding to a raise since I don't think there will be many bluff raises.


Originally posted by pzhon
The preflop raiser folded on the turn. The CO open-limp/called preflop, which suggests a bad player with a weak range. I would not worry about AK or AQ in his range, since hands like A4 and JT are more likely. I would bet the river for value, probably folding to a raise since I don't think there will be many bluff raises.

i agree.

pre, flop and turn are all fine. bet/fold river


Share: