Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] K5s from CO

4 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
236 Views

Stupid hand to play?

Cake - $0.05/$0.10 - Holdem - 8 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 3

UTG: $8.20
UTG+1: $7.99
MP: $2.66
MP+1: $3.66
Hero (CO): $1.60
BTN: $0.24
SB: $2.16
BB: $4.10

SB posts SB $0.02, BB posts BB $0.05

Pre Flop: ($0.07) Hero has K♠ 5♠

fold, fold, fold, MP+1 calls $0.05, Hero calls $0.05, fold, SB calls $0.03, BB checks

Flop: ($0.20, 4 players) K♥ 9♥ 9♣
SB checks, BB checks, MP+1 checks, Hero bets $0.05, SB calls $0.05, fold, MP+1 calls $0.05

Turn: ($0.35, 3 players) 2♦
SB checks, MP+1 checks, Hero bets $0.10, SB calls $0.10, MP+1 calls $0.10

River: ($0.65, 3 players) 7♣
SB checks, MP+1 checks, Hero checks


3 replies

if you had 2 limpers & you were on the button with blinds that rarely raise then i think overlimping gains some strength as a +EV option. I would have folded preflop, but i think your postflop line is fine. I would consider betting the river often but some conditions would lead me to check as you have here.


Thanks - this table was super-tight, so pre-flop I thought that (if the button folds) I'd have position post-flop should I flop something of worth. Also, I was hoping for either a FD or TK (and play it according to how aggressive everyone was afterwards).

I'd been card-dead for a while, and so I thought if I had position Post-Flop I'd give it a go. Normally on a loose table, it's a no-brainer pre-flop fold.


firsttsunami
Joined: 23.01.2006

fold preflop but after 2limpers i had overlimped too and when you say the table was supertight it's questionable whether to bet the river or not. if there is a reason to think that some of them could have just played a better king passively i like the checkbehind and to be honest there are not many worse hands that could call the river but when you are facing at least 1 calligstation around i'd bet the river. :)