Best review not only hands you think you played poorly but also hands you had a difficult decision. Often difficult situations are of recurring types. It is helpful to group the hands in categories like playing overcards, playing against turn raises and the like. Filters in PT3 can help you with that. If you review hands of a certain type you will get a much better feel for this kind of hand than by reviewing hands as they come. You can see if you played similar situations differently and think about why. Also post a typical hand of the category and see what the judges have to say about it. Note how different parameters in one kind of situations might change optimal play (things like position, position relatice to an aggressor, number of opponents, board structure, pot size and so on). In this way you not only learn how to play a certain situation in general but you will learn to judge the circumstances and react to them.
Another good exercise is to look at a flop and lay out a plan for the rest of the hand. What can happen to your hand? Which card on the turn or the river or which action of the opponent coukld change your plan? Compare to the actual play during turn and river. Was the play on turn and river in line with your expectation on the flop? With this kind of exercise you learn to be prepared to future develoments. You'll think quicker and better.
Playing around with an equity calculator may be relevating, but you need to learn to judge ranges first. If your ranges are off, no calculator can give you the right equity. This is where the hand judges can be of great value. If you post a hand, write down the range you expect and compare it with the range the judge gives.
I find that using the hand charts is better than using pokerstove at the moment - but that's down to the crazy-folks on the micros who barrel every street with 93o hoping that you fold your overpair.
