Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] fold/call riever shove?

5 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
306 Views
SAJTOSPITE
Joined: 05.03.2010

Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $0.50(BB) Replayer
SB ($48.75)
BB ($78.60)
UTG ($56.11) 35/17 AF:3,4 W&SD:52% 6,2k hands 3,3 BB/100(!!!)
Hero ($54.50) 25/20
CO ($71.65)
BTN ($49.25)

Dealt to Hero 2♣ 2♦

UTG calls $0.50, Hero calls $0.50, fold, fold, fold, BB checks

FLOP ($1.75) 9♥ 2♥ 8♠

BB checks, UTG bets $0.50, Hero raises to $2, BB folds, UTG calls $1.50

TURN ($5.75) 9♥ 2♥ 8♠ 5♠

UTG checks, Hero bets $5.50, UTG calls $5.50

RIVER ($16.75) 9♥ 2♥ 8♠ 5♠ A♦

UTG checks, Hero bets $13.25, UTG raises to $48.11 (AI), Hero ???


4 replies
BoyRobot777
Joined: 26.01.2009

you limp in with pockets?.... in nl50?... well... i dont know.. can he play 67 that way?... i think he had two pair and overplayed it ?... but heck. shit i know


Head Admin
SvenBe
Joined: 19.04.2006

howdy,
I moved the hand to our dedicated hand evaluation forum - our professional and voluntary judges will also have an eye on this hand!


Tim64
Joined: 03.11.2008

well, open limping is one thing. limping behind is another. if the table is passive, this can be a good way to see a cheap flop with a speculative hand.

as played, bet/call river looks fine. If villain has higher set, he either got lucky on the river or misplayed it earlier in the hand. Also if he had 67 he should definitely raise turn as there are 2 flush draws.

So i think there are enough worse hands and bluffs to go broke - nh!


I´d personally would isolate pf, but I guess calling is also fine
Since two flushdraws missed and A is scare card I would also b/c river, since only hand that he is likely shoving river is 67 and I´d expect him to c/r that hand on the turn