Originally posted by w34z3l
Originally posted by Boomer2k10
If you're shorthanded and the raise is from anywhere but UTG AJo should be a snap 3-bet vs almost anyone. Not 3-betting it in that situation is leaving money on the table ESPECIALLY on the button.
If the raise is from UTG vs most players I'd 3-bet anyway but I can see it being more understandable.
In a FR game vs a raise from EP which is most likely to be AJ+ and mid-high PPs then it's fairly sage advice on the whole.
Seems to be pretty bad advice to be giving a new player, especially from a coach. No offense.
While this advice may be ok for certain specific situations it doesn't address the spectrum of various reasons for 3betting.
It's fine as a value raise against a player with a low enough fold to 3bet and a large enough VPIP/PFR, but against a tight player with a high fold to 3bet you may often be either getting folds or isolating yourself against a stronger range.
This can naturally cause huge problems when you flop a pair, especially when you didn't understand initially whether you were 3betting for FE or for value. And naturally, AJo is a poor hand to 3bet "bluff" with since it has a reasonable amount of value.
Against one type of player you'd be wanting to 3bet a polarized range (possibly weighted towards bluffs), and against the other type you'd want to 3bet a depolarized value range. Just telling someone AJo is a standard snap 3-bet really helps no-one.
A little information can be dangerous.
anyway, this is just fwiw. I don't actually care.
Welcome to fixed limit boards.