[Closed] 69o 3 handed

Hand discussions for Sit and Go-Tournaments

Last Post by _Anonymous_ 15 years ago

4 Posts

4 Users

0 Reactions

203 Views

RSS

Gavron23

Joined: 26.05.2010

Posts: 2,727

28.04.2011, 17:07 0

Full Tilt Poker No Limit Hold'em Tournament - t300.00/t600.00 Blinds - 3 players - View hand 1292305
DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter

BTN: t4780.00 7.97 BBs
SB: t1340.00 2.23 BBs
Hero (BB): t7380.00 12.30 BBs

Pre Flop: (t900) Hero is BB with 6 :diamond: 9 :heart:
BTN raises to t1200, 1 fold, Hero raises to t7380, BTN calls t3580 all in

Flop: (t9860) Q :diamond: 8 5 (2 players - 1 is all in)

Turn: (t9860) 6 :spade: (2 players - 1 is all in)

River: (t9860) 3 :heart: (2 players - 1 is all in)

I thought this was a good place to exploit middle stack's risk aversion.
Although lots if not many of the players on this limit does not seem to know what risk aversion means..

My SNG blog

3 replies

Duncan737

Joined: 09.08.2010

Posts: 279

28.04.2011, 17:33 0

Originally posted by Gavron23
many of the players on this limit does not seem to know what risk aversion means..

As you said, most of them don't know what is risk aversion. Without specific notes that he steal a lot, I would probably fold. Push hands with some equity like JTo, suited cons, Ax...

akrammon

Joined: 17.05.2009

Posts: 2,878

28.04.2011, 19:35 0

I don't like this. One, villain has to be a reg to understand these mechanics of the game and be super tight. Two, you are already ITM so risk aversion is significantly smaller. I'm not saying its zero or insignificant, but def not good enough to push atc there. With at least a blocker, maybe, not sure about that.

:club: akrammon's midstakes STTs :club:

_Anonymous_

28.04.2011, 22:30 0

Originally posted by Gavron23
many of the players on this limit does not seem to know what risk aversion means..

this!

dont abuse bad players, they dont know what they are doing. especially when its already ITM. their risk-aversion is a lot lower compared to the bubble.