The guy looked like a big fish. He played very loose and aggressive. We played a couple of hands with him and none of them was like a walk in the park for me. He always raised me, floated me after calling resteals etc.
So in this hand I assume that he calls my 3bet with almost all hands in his steal range. And that's a lot, I assume that it will be about 40%. It's not 100% because he limped some hands too.
Flop and turn are standart, but river is a really tough spot. I don't think that AK is in his range, because probably he would 4bet it preflop. But hands like KT-KQ are definetely there. He would probably call them on flop and he never folds turn with them either.
So I decided to check/call the river since the valubet here would be too thin. But after he shoved I assume that I have called just because of tilt and not because calling is superior here. Do you think folding is better?
Poker Stars, $0.10/$0.25 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.
UTG: $10.29 (41.2 bb)
MP: $26.13 (104.5 bb)
CO: $29.02 (116.1 bb)
BTN: $15 (60 bb)
Hero (SB): $32.79 (131.2 bb)
BB: $25.35 (101.4 bb)
Preflop: Hero is SB with A
A
2 folds, CO raises to $0.75, BTN folds, Hero raises to $2.50, BB folds, CO calls $1.75
Flop: ($5.25) 7
2
3 (2 players)
Hero bets $3, CO calls $3
Turn: ($11.25) K (2 players)
Hero bets $6, CO calls $6
River: ($23.25) K (2 players)
Hero checks, CO bets $17.52 and is all-in, Hero calls $17.52
