[Closed] NL100: Ongame, Partypoker or Everest??

doesn't matter imo, nl 100 is still bad everywhere

i hear ongame is preaty fishy . party started to be something like ftp .
ipoker is still full of fish imo

Party is still fishy ...

...and iPoker is rather weak-tight at nl100+

Originally posted by swissmoumout
...and iPoker is rather weak-tight at nl100+

Weak tight is fun too

but not as profitable as, say, party, since it isn't anything like ftp etc...

Ongame are the worst players they always pay off

dont leave me! Ill feel so alone ;(.

Play for skills/moving up limits, not money...

Originally posted by helemaalnicks
dont leave me! Ill feel so alone ;(.

Play for skills/moving up limits, not money...

But if we play for skill, we can't spam the forums with bad beats anymore

I would recommend IPoker and Ongame. Party is not my choice anymore.

Good luck!
thunderbird56

But if we play for skill, we can't spam the forums with bad beats anymore

why not? I still do that ^^.

Originally posted by thunderbird56
I would recommend IPoker and Ongame. Party is not my choice anymore.

Good luck!
thunderbird56

How come ?

IPoker, as well as Ongame, is full of fishes/ bad players. One of the reasons is that many of its partners are sports betting bookies/ casinos which bring their customers with "gambling skills" to poker tables. I don't vote for Party just because I see its players are becoming tighter or harder to beat than before.

Good luck!
thunderbird56

From what I heard everest has the worst players, but also the worst software..

Originally posted by thunderbird56
IPoker, as well as Ongame, is full of fishes/ bad players. One of the reasons is that many of its partners are sports betting bookies/ casinos which bring their customers with "gambling skills" to poker tables. I don't vote for Party just because I see its players are becoming tighter or harder to beat than before.

Good luck!
thunderbird56

At FL I agree, I can't agree for NL.
The tight players got numerous leaks and at every NL100SH table there's usually at least one 33/5 fish, often enough you'll also spot the 70/40 gold mines.

at every NL100SH table there's usually at least one 33/5 fish

ehhh, wtf? Stars is full of those, and not famous for its fishyness. I think this kinda proves Thunderbirds' point.

if we include rakeback/loyalty schemes/other promotions would that change anyones answers? as i currently play on party and UB but i was looking to change from UB as although i get 30% RB on top of their loyalty scheme they only have badbeat jackpot tables which almost cancels that all out although the players there are super fishy 32/5 is pretty normal there.

so what do you think is the most profitable . good rake back + fishes ?

I'm currently sticking with Full Tilt. The opponents may be tighter, but still enough fishes for you if you know how to find them. Besides, the 27% rakeback is really a great deal.

Good luck!
thunderbird56