Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

Plo10 Qq69

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
309 Views
Jehryn
Joined: 15.04.2008

IPoker, $0.05/$0.10 Pot Limit Omaha Cash, 6 Players

UTG: $20.99 (209.9 bb)
MP: $9.53 (95.3 bb)
CO: $10 (100 bb)
BTN: $10 (100 bb)
SB: $5.18 (51.8 bb)
Hero (BB): $14.20 (142 bb)

Preflop: Hero is BB with Q Q 6 9
UTG folds, MP raises to $0.35, 3 folds, Hero calls $0.25

Flop: ($0.75) 2 3 A (2 players)
Hero checks, MP checks

Spoiler

Turn: ($0.75) T (2 players)
Hero bets $0.40, MP calls $0.40

River: ($1.55) J (2 players)
Hero bets $0.77, MP folds

Results: $1.55 pot ($0.10 rake)Final Board: 2 3 A T J MP mucked and lost (-$0.75 net)Hero mucked Q Q 6 9 and won $1.45 ($0.70 net)

Villain is 54/23/05 on 35 hands.

Since the pot is small and he most likely missed the flop, I was planning on checkraising & folding when rereraised.

Good/Bad idea?


Reply
Quote
1 reply
Ribbo
Joined: 25.06.2010

You're turning your hand into a bluff by betting the turn. You could well be ahead with your pair of queens but there isn't really a whole load of reasons to bet as you have to fold if you get raised plus I don't see how a worse hand calls. Villain could well check behind this flop with a weak ace (like A987).

As played however on the river you have 2 choices, bet full pot or fold. A half pot bet is unlikely to get a weak ace calling and villain definitely doesn't have a set or straight so his range is busted flush draw in clubs or a diamond flush.

With this in mind you should either check and hope villain bluffs his busted draw or you should bet full pot and get worse flushes to call (obviously folding if he raises). The half pot bet has the same effect as the full pot bet, hands that would call one will call the other it just means you win less when villain does have a weaker flush by not betting full pot.


Reply
Quote