Full Tilt Poker, $2 + $0.25 NL Hold'em Sit n' Go, 60/120 Blinds, 4 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter
BTN: 1,765
Hero (SB): 4,210
BB: 5,605
UTG: 1,920
Pre-Flop: (180) K♥ A♥ dealt to Hero (SB)
2 folds, Hero raises to 360, BB calls 240
Flop: (720) K♠ 8♣ 6♣ (2 Players)
Hero bets 490, BB calls 490
Turn: (1,700) 6♠ (2 Players)
Hero bets 1,200, BB raises to 4,755 and is All-In, Hero calls 2,160 and is All-In
River: (8,420) J♥ (2 Players - 1 is All-In)
Results: 8,420 Pot
Originally posted by chenny8888
in these spots betting pot on the flop is better IMO.nh wp regardless.
i totally disagree.
Originally posted by helemaalnicks
Originally posted by chenny8888
in these spots betting pot on the flop is better IMO.nh wp regardless.
i totally disagree.
Please explain yourself Helemaalnicks.
Best regards,
TribunCaesar
sorry I cant really, except by saying: why bet pot if you can protect/minimize FE with less... and get the money in anyway.
b/c we want to maximise FE on the bubble, even with the best hand like TPTK because it's still very vulnerable. especially against the co-chip leader.
failing that, we want to get as much money in when we are pretty sure we're ahead (that is, on the flop).
anyway it's a small difference, turn is standard @ not folding
