I'm a loose-aggressive player by nature, especially on the remarkably tight tables I play on Cake Poker. I usually play 20NL but occasionally venture into 50NL or drop back to 10NL when the 20NL tables have long wait lists.
I do a LOT of stealing from the blinds and late position because it almost always works, so there will be times where I'll steal from both blinds, BTN and CO, and then I'll actually have cards in HJ and MP+1, so there are times where I'll raise pre 6 hands in a row!
I even 3-bet pre quite a bit, not necessarily with ATC but if I sense it's going to work often enough to be profitable I'll do it all day.
Here's my question (hoping for your opinions):
How much credit should I be giving the villains for adjusting to my style at these levels?
The reason I ask is I'm losing large pots because of villains actually having cards, i.e. on a hand where I've raised pre for the 4th hand in a row I'll have AJo in MP+1, 3 players will call, The flop will come A42r, I'll bet 2/3 of the pot and the villain will shove. My instincts tell me he's getting sick and tired of me stealing every *($(*#@( pot and is just raising to send a message. Well, in that case he had A4 and I lost a lot of money (about 2/3 of my stack). I know he could have also had AQ, AK, A2, 22 or 44 there as well (I typically assume people will 3-bet pre with AA), but that, at least in my opinion, is a VERY small percentage of the range a player will call with from late position.
Another example is I'll raise pre to 3bb for the 3rd or 4th time in a row and a villain will 3-bet shove. Again, I'll just assume he's sick of me being a bully and call, and he has KK. Again, I lose.
So, hoping I can actually make the question make sense, any advice on how to react to a re-raise, how to know if it's a strong hand vs. their "standing up to a bully"?