Ill put the rake this way, 4 tabling NL10 with semi decent volume i would have to put in a lot of time to reach gold status, 1 tabling HU hypers, ive nearly reached 500 SP in like half the month haha
Haven't played any hypers at Stars for maybe a month or so. What I was playing there was Hyper-Turbo Satellites and not your standard Hyper-Turbo SNGs. Played a couple of them but no sample really.
Gary, always a pleasure ♦ I only started playing the HU hypers last week 
but i did also sometimes play the 6 max hypers sats for the sunday storm? every play those?
Stars have the lowest rake out there (may be better, but not many and certainly not with the same game availability).
888 have one of the weakest player pools in the market and one of the higher rake structures.
Neither have an amazing VIP system.
As always, the best decision is to spend most of your time where you make the highest $/hour played.
yeahhh your right, at my stakes at least, gunna stick with 888 for the moment, seems a shame to waste the bonus when the player pool is so fishy, im probably making more for the moment as im a fish too
FWIW at higher stakes 888 has one of the lowest rake structures in the business.
interesting, can yu tell me what kinda stakes wasy? i know that for HU hypers, stars charges less rake for a $30 game than 888 does for a $12.50 game!
3.5 also at starts are veeeeeery fishy.
Whats your ITM % if I may ask?
ahhh daun ive seen your blog around, may have to give it a read later, hmmm my ITM finishs arent great as yu have to remember im learnin as i go along and trying to pick up any material to improve my game
for the $1.60s its 50%, which due to rake im losing
for the $3.20s im 52% which im like 1.5BI down, but i feel my game has improves loads just over this short space on time so guess maybe after a decent smaple of maybe 1k games, could get a slightly better idea?
whats your ITM finishes?
The 2 i lost were standard races anyways
