1000bb+ pot

Actually no You add the three weakest stacks that were in the pot till the end, add the 2nd highest stack another time + blinds + antes + what player who folded lost.

So you have:

19.5+23.07+24.45+24.45+0.25+0.5+1.3

93.52 I think. Close still.

The surplus from perrel01's stack is getting back to him since none of you can cover the bet.

L3st, you owe me like 2-3mins of your life.

I think you can fold to that shove.

Not even being results-oriented as I saw the screenshot before the HH/results.

Can't see middle set being ahead in a four-way pot there. Expected to see 77 and 58 a lot.

I think it's +EV by several 100bb to call, we're happy to see 58

Originally posted by MJPerry
I think you can fold to that shove.

Not even being results-oriented as I saw the screenshot before the HH/results.

Can't see middle set being ahead in a four-way pot there. Expected to see 77 and 58 a lot.

58 really?

honestly folding didn't even go through my mind at one tiny moment.
the only hand I give merit to is 77 but folding to that shove is absolutely out of the question IMHO.

I'm never folding there. nh!

Today I learned that I'm a nit.

Originally posted by MJPerry
Today I learned that I'm a nit.

Me too. I'm not shocked though. I AM a nit!

I could get rid of 44 on the flop, second set is tougher, op dependant for me but most likely a fold. That pot does look tasy though..mmm...mucho chippies.

And yes I'm a nit to.

Originally posted by justkyle88
L3st, you owe me like 2-3mins of your life.

He's still right though, the surplus from perells stack is just going to go back to him at the end because no one could match it. Only perell could win the full $106 in the pot, its less for everyone else.

The pot is actually 93$ since 13 will be returned back to perel once the money goes in the middle. If perel would have 250$ in stack this still wouldn't make it a 3000bb pot.

As for folding you really can't find a fold here. Maybe in knorrr or timogen spot its probably a fold since 4way some has top set most of the time and your drawing dead.

Ahh I see your point now. Regardless anyhow

Originally posted by justkyle88
L3st, you owe me like 2-3mins of your life.

I want my 3 minutes back, and I'm charging vig!

Anyway, pretty impossible to find a fold in NLHE. Would have been fun to fold and see all three of them with flush draw, Like A2s, K3s, Q4s.
In PLO would have been an instafold ♦

You definitely can't fold there, you made the right call.

With three people all in in front, you should be folding because it'd be looking like someone had 77, 58 or a monster draw, but easy call w just 1 all in.

Originally posted by L3ST

Originally posted by justkyle88
L3st, you owe me like 2-3mins of your life.

I want my 3 minutes back, and I'm charging vig!

Anyway, pretty impossible to find a fold in NLHE. Would have been fun to fold and see all three of them with flush draw, Like A2s, K3s, Q4s.
In PLO would have been an instafold ♦

My apoligies haha

PLO ofcourse but this aint PLO

I'm glad I made the right decision, just such an epic hand.

Cheers peeps.

Haha I lost a $90 pot at the NL10 6max deep tables yesterday... Flopped a set of 3's, check raised, lead the Q turn and he shoved $45 or something, I called and he had QQ. Was just two of us in the pot lol.

it's a fold imo. even if the shover has a flushdraw, it's obvious that one of the players who flat-called the raise on the most drawy flop ever holds exactly 77. understanding this is what seperates a micro-stakes donkt from a great poker player.

I would snap fold this

But I'm a nit as well...

I really don't see folding an option vs just 1 shover?

I mean maybe if I was looking at 2-3shoves in front sure, but flat calls how can I just be like, yep he's got a set 100% of the time and fold.

Someone give me a sicko explanation of folding and I'll bow until eternity