Well hello. I'm from Finland. I've been playing poker about 14 months now, sometimes more, sometimes less. I've managed to climb from 6max NL4 to NL50, and now I'm about to take my first shots @ NL100. Not until Monday though, since this weekend I'm going to some music festival with my friends and I really don't want to hit a massive soulcrushing downswing before that. After that I can play poker all July and August.
Anyway, ever since I started to make 400€+ a month playing poker (@ NL20, with good RB pretty easy even if u don't play that much), I've been using my winnings to finance my living without having to take a part time job while studying. So that's been slowing my rise. Also when I first started NL50 with 60 bins I had a decent downswing losing over 40% of my bankroll. That sucked, so I took a 2 month break from poker, bought a new computer along with HEM2, and started fresh about 3 months ago. Played a month NL20, and moved up again. Here's the NL50 results with HEM2 (It's 3-10 players, so that the SB stats don't get messed up, since I start a lot of tables and play some HU vs. fish before others join the table):

I guess I'm a TAG. But that's OK. Here are some stats:

Some points to consider:
¤ I'm pretty tight in EP's. Someone might argue that I'm pretty tight in all positions. I need to open my button more, of that I'm certain. Especially when my Cbet success % is 53 OTB.
¤ I'm 4betting quite a lot while not folding to 5bets; however I have 52.8% equity when I have been all in preflop. So I must be doing something right, although it would be nice to see some other winning regs stats with a big sample size.
¤ I don't fold a lot to 3bets. It's a leak, although since I'm pretty tight preflop and I don't think all regs are adjusting to that, I think I can call 3bets quite a lot since I'm ahead of their range, but maybe folding only 50% is still too little.
¤ My WtSD is 28%. That's a lot. However, I've won almost 52% @SD. That's because I tend to bluffcatch a good deal, especially vs. fishes (I don't like to use the term fish btw). For example if someone folds < 40% vs. cbets and has a high river AF, I tend to checkback the turn a lot, hoping to catch a bluff on the river instead of making him fold the turn.
¤ I'm Cbetting 64.5% with an overall 49.1% success. That is profitable, since my sizing is usually 50-90% of the pot. I think I'm pretty good at being able to identify spots where it's just better to check-fold. However with that high of a success rate I could consider Cbetting more, especially with some equity.
That's for the stats. Like for many others, my biggest problem is tilting. I've probably spewed away +5 bins with super monkey idiot tilt, calling 5bets with 63o and shoving over turn raises with zero equity (knowing that the opponent knows I'm tilting, so he's not bluffing). And probably lost a lot, lot more with those "f*ck u, u can't always suck out on me" -calls. I would probably have at least 15-20 bins more winnings over the 88k hands had I quit every time I realized I was tilting. From now on I try to use a 3bin stop-loss.
Another big leak is trying to book a win when I'm up and quit, and being unable to quit when I'm down.
Some random ideas:
¤ I think that in order to be happy a person needs a purpose. A somekind of passion, so that life is not just an uninspirational ride through the highway of boredom and mediocrity. I don't have that passion yet, but I'm hoping to find it. However poker is not my passion. It's fun and I'm addicted to it (in a good way), but being a poker player it's not my goal in life. That said, I have no objections making money while looking for my personal purpose. I'm intelligent, very competitive and pretty obsessive-compulsive when I'm interested in something - and what more do you need for a good poker player? I'm highly confident I can move higher in limits and earn some decent bucks.
¤ Physical exercise is something everyone should do. The feeling after a good, sweaty workout is just so great.
¤ Passivity is a good thing in some areas of life, because it forces you to think through before acting and doing something stupid. Phil Galfond says he is passive by nature, and I strongly identify with him.
¤ Passivity is a bad thing in many areas of life. If you always fear acting stupid, you will never accomplish anything.
¤ When you label yourself as introvert, passive, quiet or whatever, you are actively enhancing those qualities in yourself. Sure, many personality traits are probably genetically predisposed, but at some point you have to stop fulfilling the selfproclaimed prophesy of yourself and get out of the comfort zone.
¤ I fit to the online poker player stereotype perfectly, but I'm hoping to grow out of it.


