Party, $0.01/$0.02 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 7 Players
BB: $2.25 (112.5 bb)
Hero (SB): $2.37 (118.5 bb)
MP1: $2.59 (129.5 bb)
MP3: $1.29 (64.5 bb)
MP2: $1.94 (97 bb)
BTN: $1.12 (56 bb)
CO: $2 (100 bb)
Preflop: Hero is SB with 3
3![]()
MP1 folds, MP2 calls $0.02, 3 folds, Hero raises to $0.08, BB folds, MP2 calls $0.06
Flop: ($0.18) 5
8
3
(2 players)
Hero bets $0.12, MP2 raises to $0.40, Hero calls $0.28
Turn: ($0.98) 2
(2 players)
Hero checks, MP2 bets $0.94, Hero folds
Results:
Spoiler
$0.98 pot ($0.04 rake)
Final Board: 5
8
3
2
Hero mucked 3
3
and lost (-$0.48 net)
MP2 mucked and won $0.94 ($0.46 net)
Not many hands on villain. Limped quite a bit, seemed loose and passive.
Anyway I hit the set on the flop and bet for value. The monotone flop is a bit annoying. I call the reraise on the flop, primarily to see what he does on the turn. I wonder if, seeing as he seemed relatively passive, that it might have been better to give up the hand here?
With the fourth spade on the turn I figure it's good to check here, and see what the villain does. I'm not sure I want to be double barrelling against an opponent that is usually passive but is showing a lot of strength. I think it's pretty unlikely he has anything other than a good flush here, but should I have still bet the turn here anyway?