Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] Royal Flush, agains loose passive

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
317 Views
MiddleMan
Joined: 20.03.2008

My first Royal Flush, how did i played it?
Didnt want to go all in, since i needed chips and didnt think he would call all in. Maybe i should have bet on turn? And villian wouldnt bet according to pot anyway, so no real use of building up a big pot.

Poker Stars, $2 + $0.20 NL Hold'em Tournament, 50/100 Blinds, 9 Players
LeggoPoker.com - Hand History Converter

UTG: 3,962
UTG+1: 3,364
UTG+2: 1,415
MP1: 1,375
MP2: 4,025
CO: 1,074
BTN: 2,849
SB: 3,780
Hero (BB): 1,650

Pre-Flop: (150) J♠ T♠ dealt to Hero (BB)
UTG calls 100, 6 folds, SB calls 50, Hero checks

Flop: (300) K♠ A♠ J♦ (3 Players)
SB bets 100, Hero calls 100, UTG calls 100

Turn: (600) Q♠ (3 Players)
SB bets 200, Hero calls 200, UTG folds

River: (1,000) Q♣ (2 Players)
SB bets 100, Hero raises to 500, SB calls 400

Dont think there is any use of hiding results :rolleyes:
Results: 2,000 Pot
SB mucked 5♥ A♥ and LOST (-900 NET)
Hero showed J♠ T♠ (a Royal Flush) and WON 2,000 (+1,100 NET)


2 replies

I would raise the flop here, you have a pair and a good draw, albeit not monster, you still have more than 50% equity against most hands. You can also go broke on a flop like this.


Unam
Joined: 17.08.2006

Hi,
I would riase the turn to build a pot here.
hmm and don't fold on the river ;)