Known players:
[tg]Hero$22,23:///////;SB$20,00:///////;CO$28,34:///////;BU$5,49:///////;MP3$20,51:///////;[/tg]
MP3 had solid stats with about 10 PFR.
0,1/0,2 No-Limit Hold'em (5 handed)
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: PokerStrategy Elephant 0.55 by www.pokerstrategy.com.
Preflop: Hero is BB with K♣, K♦
MP3 raises to $0,80, CO folds, BU calls $0,80, SB calls $0,70, Hero raises to $4,00, MP3 raises to $12,00, 2 folds, Hero raises to $22,23 (All-In), MP3 raises to $20,51 (All-In).
I heard a lot of time and read it in book and here in the forums that you shouldn't fold KK preflop, no matter what.
I have some doubts about it now, and i am curious on your opinion.
This hand was the third time i knew that my opponent had very likely Aces and i thought i should fold, but i didn't, because of that 'rule'.
I know that i should now remember the occasions when i thought he had Aces and he actually didn't, but of course i can't remember to those ![]()
But if we look at this specific hand i think the equity calculation shows that folding is a reasonable option here:
Villain is a tight player, he open raises from middle position, got 2 callers and a big 3bet from the big blind, and he 4bets.
I think with AK, the size of his 4bet is questionable, because if i call, he can't fold with only 1/3 pot money left even if no Ace or King comes on the flop. So a call in position or a push would be a better option for him with AK.
Even if we assume he makes this paly half the time with AK's, than his range can be something like:
AA,KK, AK(50% of time)
Wins Ties Equity
34.81% 4.63% 39.44% ( KK )
55.93% 4.63% 60.56% ( AA,AK(50),KK )
winning odds: 40 : 60 = 1.5
pot odds: 17.5 : 26.1 = 1.5
So with that range, folding could be ok here, making a lower variance play.
With tighter range, which i felt he had in that situation, folding might be better.
What do you think?