Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

NL10 - 89s

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
187 Views

Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $0.10(BB) Replayer
Hero ($25.53)
BB ($2.13)
UTG ($10.15) 22/19, 82 hands
UTG+1 ($5)
CO ($29.54)
BTN ($5.05)

Dealt to Hero 8♠ 9♠

UTG raises to $0.40, fold, fold, fold, Hero raises to $1, fold, UTG calls $0.60

FLOP ($2.10) Q♣ 6♥ 4♠

Hero bets $1, UTG calls $1

TURN ($4.10) Q♣ 6♥ 4♠ 7♣

Hero checks, UTG bets $1.22, Hero calls $1.22

RIVER ($6.54) Q♣ 6♥ 4♠ 7♣ Q♠

Hero checks, UTG bets $1.95, Hero raises to $5.60,

Spoiler

UTG calls $3.65

Hero shows 8♠ 9♠
(Pre 20%, Flop 9.6%, Turn 18.2%)

UTG shows J♣ J♦
(Pre 80%, Flop 90.4%, Turn 81.8%)

UTG wins $16.94

I know it it was pretty foolish to 3-bet such a player OOP, was quite in tilt. Betting flop was okay I guess and I had decent pot odds calling a turn bet. But the question here is, that is it profitable to make bluff check-rise in such spot? I could represent Qx type of hand and his smallbets made it look like he definitely has something like 77-JJ or made a missed FD with AK/AJ of clubs. And also was my 3-bet sizing in river too small to make him fold pocket pairs?


Reply
Quote
1 reply

Hello,

First of all, I don't like the 3bet here. I'd be more inclined to 3bet with some blockers, and also your sizing is very weak - make it $1.3 instead.

I don't mind cbetting on the flop as long as you are planning to bet some turn cards that are good to bluff and improve our equity.

So, considering that the 7 gives us OESD and we do have some fold equity I'd go ahead and bet myself here.

As played, I'd just check/fold on the river. Don't really think we will generate too much FE in this spot, considering our line on the previous streets.

Best,
Plamen


Reply
Quote
Share: