22$; 10man; bb300, Q7o freeplay vs a confusing line from a reg

When I see BU-limps from regs around 10bb, it has always been a trap. But that doesn't meen nothing cause it happened just twice or so to me.
And to the deeper BU limping, i hear often about it but have never seen it in action.
I guess a "playability"-hand like 67s against loose bad blinds would be a good candidate?
one could construct something with a bigblind who doesnt like to fold his blind but gives up flop when he doesnt hit. than one could do it very wide, but how often do you have such a precise read one someone, plus the SB will enter the hand most often, so thats bs i guess.
intrested in further opinions.
on flop line:
hard one.
i dont like bet/fold, because a reg will shove his flushdraws (at least I would). so if you bet you have to call => check/raise(little smaller)/fold seems nice but if he's really good he could get to the idea that you are never really strong because of your preflop check (except Q6 and Q9) and shove wide. check/call brings the same problem

firstly, filter your SS searches. ROIs are skewed by MTTs, i highly doubt he is actually running at 15% over 19k games in 6max. if he is please screenshot and send to me lol im intrigued.

for the hand, btn limp strategies are used to counter high rejam%. ie. if stacks are 15-20bbs effective he is going to get re-stealed very often by regs so limping the BTN can counter this. with 10-13bbs (like this hand) its not a good strategy because he is committed against a SB shove and it is much easier for you to exploit a BTN limp (if he is not balancing) by shoving pre with 13bbs compared to 20bbs.

for the hand, readless i would assume he is trapping and just c/f flop

I hope its not gonna breach any of the forum rules (i dont see why it would), if it does tough, my apologies, feel free to delete it If tdan89 is actually a user of this forum youve got my sincere respect, if you dont like me posting your SS here, pls PM me, ill take it down.

p.s. some values are a bit different than the ones i mention in my opening post cause i took the latter from my 'SS notes' i have, which are obviously limited compared to SS itself. As you can see i dont have an SS subscription so my search is limited. If anyone with a subscription wants to do the search more thoroughly and possibly find a proof that tdan is actually not a superhuman feel free to do it

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

You still need to filter more. you can only do it with a subscription. but you need to filter for last 12 months and for a specific sng only, not all sng.

he looks like a good player, definitely.

Originally posted by lessthanthreee
for the hand, btn limp strategies are used to counter high rejam%. ie. if stacks are 15-20bbs effective he is going to get re-stealed very often by regs so limping the BTN can counter this.

so what range would you suggest doing that with (obv only against known regs in blinds who like to resteal wide)? Id assume the weaker part of my 'stealing' range, hands that are definietely not good enough for an induce. But thats not very ballanced so should i leave some of these in my r/f range and add some inducing hands simply? i guess ive answered my own question but anyway it would be nice if you could comment/confirm that.

out of curiosity - do you use this strategy? in other words is it a must on higher stakes with tougher competition or not really and while it may boost your ROI slightly it may not even be worth to 'work hard' on implementing?

hands that play good post-flop but arent strong enough to r/c. like JTs/QJs.

its very easy to balance, just limp QQ+ to trap occasionally.

yes, i use it. I was one of the first people to use it in HSSTTs.

Its great for countering high 3bet resteals and for isolating 1 fish in the blinds when there is a good aggressive restealer in the other position.