Grabbed by Holdem Manager
NL Holdem $0.25(BB) Replayer
SB ($36.29)
BB ($25)
UTG ($19.13)
UTG+1 ($49.30)
UTG+2 ($43.34)
Hero ($55.86)
MP2 ($24.30)
CO ($24.32)
BTN ($18.19)
Dealt to Hero A♣ K♠
fold, fold, UTG+2 raises to $0.50, Hero raises to $1.90, fold, fold, fold, fold, fold, UTG+2 calls $1.40
FLOP ($4.15) A♦ Q♥ K♥
UTG+2 bets $0.25, Hero raises to $2.50, UTG+2 calls $2.25
TURN ($9.15) A♦ Q♥ K♥ 6♣
UTG+2 bets $0.75, Hero raises to $5.90, UTG+2 calls $5.15
RIVER ($20.95) A♦ Q♥ K♥ 6♣ 5♠
UTG+2 bets $1.25, Hero raises to $12.50, UTG+2 calls $11.25
UTG+2 shows 6♦ Q♦
(Pre 37%, Flop 12.7%, Turn 9.1%)
Hero shows A♣ K♠
(Pre 63%, Flop 87.3%, Turn 90.9%)
Hero wins $43.95
Villain is 34/19 over 32 hands, but I can't remember what they were when the hand was played, I don't think they looked so bad at the time.
My query is raise sizing with us being so deep. I can understand that his donks look like weak blocking bets, but I wasn't sure in game that trying to get him to stack 180bb was best given his likely weak range.
Do you think I played to weakly given villain is a fish, or was deciding to not blow him off his weak hands better. I know i miss value when he has AQ and KQ but given the hand he showed up with surely that's a super small part of his range.
