Hi, I'm new to fixed limit (but not to poker), and I would like to ask a few questions about this game.
I noticed that all the good FL players go to SH. I tried it out myself and it seems that SH really has better rewards. FR is just too slow. You have to grind a lot more to get the same profits as SH. Is this true?
All I know is that SH has a lot more variance. Which do you think is better FR or SH?
Thanks in advance.
SH is more fishy, because bad players loves actions 
FR is just to boring for them. And you play more hands at SH... Twice as more.
the problem is if you prefer FR.. There're not enough FR tables from $1/$2 so you're forced to SH.
Nwm, SH is more profitable, more funny, more complicated and has higher variance.
you have 2 options:
- play FR, stay on 1/2 and play for fun
- play SH, go higher and higher and play for fun+money
it's up to you 
