$0.05/$0.10 No Limit Holdem
6 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com
Stacks:
UTG ($10.05) 101bb
UTG+1 ($15.36) 154bb
CO ($19.93) 199bb
Hero (BTN) ($10.51) 105bb
SB ($11.63) 116bb
BB ($10.99) 110bb
Pre-Flop: ($0.15, 6 players) Hero is BTN 7♥ 8♥
1 fold, UTG+1 raises to $0.35, 1 fold, Hero raises to $1.10, 2 folds, UTG+1 goes all-in $15.36, Hero folds
BTN 3bet bluff ok vs unknown?
I'd rather call this and outplay him post-flop without further info. Later I could add some QT etc. for my 3-bet bluff range, sometimes maybe 89s etc.
Originally posted by CPallo
I'd rather call this and outplay him post-flop without further info. Later I could add some QT etc. for my 3-bet bluff range, sometimes maybe 89s etc.
So that means 3bet is wrong play? Why?
Hi CUvash,
PReflop: Against an unknown opponent I don't mind your 3-bet at all. We want to take the pot down and we have an ok hand if called.
Well played.
I think calling this versus a potential MP tighter range is not the greatest, especially without info.
Originally posted by Cuvash
Originally posted by CPallo
I'd rather call this and outplay him post-flop without further info. Later I could add some QT etc. for my 3-bet bluff range, sometimes maybe 89s etc.So that means 3bet is wrong play? Why?
I think 3-betting here is bad, if we really don't know villain. Suited connectors are a good hand to play IP after all. You have plenty of space to play post-flop with them, and when you 3-bet, you have to fold to 4-bet anyway. If I knew something about my villain, like fold to 3b stats, fold to cbet in 3b pots, and even the basic stats like VPIP and PFR I'd know a lot more how to play against him.
But when UNK, I usually flat pre and use my position to outplay him.
