Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

27kno turbo KTs

4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
367 Views
TheRebuz
Joined: 12.10.2008

PokerStars - $20+$5+$2|8000/16000 Ante 1600 NL - Holdem - 7 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 3

SB: 255,179.00
Hero (BB): 252,153.00
UTG: 67,788.00
UTG+1: 283,656.00
MP: 140,604.00
CO: 77,414.00
BTN: 413,896.00

SB posts ante 1,600.00, Hero posts ante 1,600.00, UTG posts ante 1,600.00, UTG+1 posts ante 1,600.00, MP posts ante 1,600.00, CO posts ante 1,600.00, BTN posts ante 1,600.00, SB posts SB 8,000.00, Hero posts BB 16,000.00

Pre Flop: (35200.00) Hero has K♠ T♠

UTG raises to 66,188.00 and is all-in, fold, fold, CO raises to 75,814.00 and is all-in, fold, fold, Hero????

27$ KNO turbo 4,5k for first
20 left we have above avg stack
no spec. reads CO is supernova and imo solid reg

so considering pot odds + 2kno + we need to invest like 1/3 stack do we call here, and what range do we call in this spot?


Reply
Quote
3 replies
chenny8888
Joined: 03.10.2007

Hi all,

Here's Nash for the scenario. We can see that with a pretty standard 32.4% (22+ Ax+ K4s+ K9o+ Q8s+ QTo+ J8s+ JTo T8s+ 98s) range for UTG (maybe even considered a tight range) and a loose 23.1%, (22+ A2s+ A7o+ K7s+ KTo+ Q9s+ QJo J9s+ T9s) call range for CO, we have a very very clear call with KTs. I would not overcall 55.1%, (22+ A2s+ A4o+ K2s+ K7o+ Q2s+ Q8o+ J3s+ J8o+ T4s+ T7o+ 94s+ 97o+ 84s+ 86o+ 73s+ 76o 63s+ 65o 52s+ 43s) and instead would tighten up to about 35-40% because CO is tighter than Nash believes, and because of our edge in the tournament. The knockout 10$ that we get is irrelevant at this point.


Reply
Quote
TheRebuz
Joined: 12.10.2008

Originally posted by chenny8888
Hi all,

Here's Nash for the scenario. We can see that with a pretty standard 32.4% (22+ Ax+ K4s+ K9o+ Q8s+ QTo+ J8s+ JTo T8s+ 98s) range for UTG (maybe even considered a tight range) and a loose 23.1%, (22+ A2s+ A7o+ K7s+ KTo+ Q9s+ QJo J9s+ T9s) call range for CO, we have a very very clear call with KTs. I would not overcall 55.1%, (22+ A2s+ A4o+ K2s+ K7o+ Q2s+ Q8o+ J3s+ J8o+ T4s+ T7o+ 94s+ 97o+ 84s+ 86o+ 73s+ 76o 63s+ 65o 52s+ 43s) and instead would tighten up to about 35-40% because CO is tighter than Nash believes, and because of our edge in the tournament. The knockout 10$ that we get is irrelevant at this point.

Why u say kno is irelevant when payjumps if I remember right r like 30-50$ from 20-10 place

Btw agree nash ranges r too loose


Reply
Quote
chenny8888
Joined: 03.10.2007

It's a fraction of 10$ (because you don't always knock them out, and you need to knock both out to get the bounty)... so the payjumps are much more significant than the bounty especially considering chips helps you get to the top 3 positions.


Reply
Quote