$3.5 hyper

How on earth would you ever fold 2P 22,5bb deep in HU:D
question is only how we will get most value.
Therefore we need to know what kind of hands we expect in villains range.
I would exclude any A or draw , because this line doesn't fit.
therefore i see air , 2end or 3th pair , and some 2P such as 57 and 56 .
Since i doubt he'll call 7x/6x on the R if you lead , we miss only marginal value vs those hands.
If we check he can bluf air , vbet Kx , and sometimes even PP like 88-QQ .
therefore i think the optimal line here is ch-R

Why would you exclude Ax?
I think that donks at $3.5 are more willing to call light rather than turn 6x into a bluff or vbet 7x.
However, i agree that ch/shove gives us more value from air, Ax, kx, 2P.
But what about smallish bet ~50ish? that would make 6x, 5x to pay us and induce thin raise for value. We can get few spews from air aswell

Originally posted by zilltine
Why would you exclude Ax?
I think that donks at $3.5 are more willing to call light rather than turn 6x into a bluff or vbet 7x.
However, i agree that ch/shove gives us more value from air, Ax, kx, 2P.
But what about smallish bet ~50ish? that would make 6x, 5x to pay us and induce thin raise for value. We can get few spews from air aswell

I think this board most fish will cbet with an A , because even they know we have quite a 'big' calling range.
I'm quite sure hes not vbetting 7x , thats what i say , we will lose value against those. So I don't claim he will vbet them Or did you mean on the T? because there i think he will atleast take a little bet:)

Originally posted by yoshiwa

Originally posted by zilltine
Why would you exclude Ax?
I think that donks at $3.5 are more willing to call light rather than turn 6x into a bluff or vbet 7x.
However, i agree that ch/shove gives us more value from air, Ax, kx, 2P.
But what about smallish bet ~50ish? that would make 6x, 5x to pay us and induce thin raise for value. We can get few spews from air aswell

I think this board most fish will cbet with an A , because even they know we have quite a 'big' calling range.
I'm quite sure hes not vbetting 7x , thats what i say , we will lose value against those. So I don't claim he will vbet them Or did you mean on the T? because there i think he will atleast take a little bet:)

I meant that frequency of randoms bluffing is lower than calling w/ 7x or 6x. I might be completely off on this on tho. And i think its mistake to to completely exclude Ax from villains range.

Originally posted by zilltine

Originally posted by yoshiwa

Originally posted by zilltine
Why would you exclude Ax?
I think that donks at $3.5 are more willing to call light rather than turn 6x into a bluff or vbet 7x.
However, i agree that ch/shove gives us more value from air, Ax, kx, 2P.
But what about smallish bet ~50ish? that would make 6x, 5x to pay us and induce thin raise for value. We can get few spews from air aswell

I think this board most fish will cbet with an A , because even they know we have quite a 'big' calling range.
I'm quite sure hes not vbetting 7x , thats what i say , we will lose value against those. So I don't claim he will vbet them Or did you mean on the T? because there i think he will atleast take a little bet:)

I meant that frequency of randoms bluffing is lower than calling w/ 7x or 6x. I might be completely off on this on tho. And i think its mistake to to completely exclude Ax from villains range.

Because we play fish that plays random , we can't ever exclude anything completly. But most of the time he will cbet Ax i guess , so the frequency drops