Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

44

3 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
248 Views

some thin value otr?

villain's wtsd: 36!!!, ftcb:18!!! over 600 hands

iPoker - $0.50 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 4 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

Hero (SB): $267.31
BB: $50.25 (VPIP: 25.27, PFR: 21.83, 3Bet Preflop: 9.73, Hands: 560)
CO: $54.35 (VPIP: 33.33, PFR: 27.78, 3Bet Preflop: 0.00, Hands: 18)
BTN: $65.71 (VPIP: 21.05, PFR: 18.34, 3Bet Preflop: 11.16, Hands: 601)

Hero posts SB $0.25, BB posts BB $0.50

Pre Flop: (pot: $0.75) Hero has 4♦ 4♠

fold, BTN raises to $1.00, Hero raises to $4.50, fold, BTN calls $3.50

Flop: ($9.50, 2 players) A♠ 2♦ 2♥
Hero checks, BTN checks

Turn: ($9.50, 2 players) 3♥
Hero checks, BTN checks

River: ($9.50, 2 players) 3♦
Hero bets $1.50, fold

Hero shows 4♦ 4♠ (Two Pair, Fours and Threes)
Hero wins $9.03


Reply
Quote
2 replies
cutegoldfish
Joined: 19.11.2009

do you think a pocket pair is folding? probably not. do you think Kx is calling? possibly.

do you think a pocket pair would fire a valuebet on the river? probably not. could he bluff with broadways after you check to him 3 times? possibly and i think the possibility of him bluffing the river is more likely than him calling with Kx on the river so i prefer check/calling.

unless he is super passive, then maybe betting for value against Kx and Qx is a better idea.

cgf


Reply
Quote

Originally posted by cutegoldfish
do you think a pocket pair is folding? probably not. do you think Kx is calling? possibly.

do you think a pocket pair would fire a valuebet on the river? probably not. could he bluff with broadways after you check to him 3 times? possibly and i think the possibility of him bluffing the river is more likely than him calling with Kx on the river so i prefer check/calling.

unless he is super passive, then maybe betting for value against Kx and Qx is a better idea.

cgf

well, the board is bouble paired, so he is calling for a split with anything worse than i have, so yeah, i think he could call even with 67s or whatever


Reply
Quote