Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

QQ deep

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
82 Views
yaxkukmian
Joined: 24.12.2007

141 hands 36/21/ 39 stl/ 41 stl from CO/17 ft3b

Poker Stars, $0.05/$0.10, $0.02 ante No Limit Hold'em Cash, 5 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

BTN: $13.93 (139.3 bb)
Hero (SB): $27.29 (272.9 bb)
BB: $12.82 (128.2 bb)
MP: $20.92 (209.2 bb)
CO: $19.01 (190.1 bb)

Preflop: Hero is SB with Q Q
MP folds, CO raises to $0.30, BTN folds, Hero raises to $1.10, BB folds, CO calls $0.80

Flop: ($2.40) 2 J K (2 players)
Hero checks, CO checks

Turn: ($2.40) T (2 players)
Hero bets $1.44, CO calls $1.44

River: ($5.28) 4 (2 players)
Hero bets $2.22, CO calls $2.22

Results:

Spoiler

$9.72 pot ($0.44 rake)
Final Board: 2 J K T 4
Hero showed Q Q and lost (-$4.78 net)
CO showed 8 5 and won $9.28 ($4.50 net)

I wasn't sure whether to cbet or not. Since we were deep I decided not to which is probably a mistake since his range is super wide. I should cbet and barrel every T and maybe c/f or c/c R.

T and R I go for smaller value since he doesn't have strong holding and I want to get value from every hand. Also he might have us beat with some 2pair combo.


Reply
Quote
1 reply
mbml
Joined: 27.11.2008

Hi.

I think the flop check is fine and you can probably go for thin value on the turn vs JX as well as flush draws.

River is close. The flush did get there, and I'm not sure how often JX is going to call. I'm also not sure if he does check back KX on the flop (it would be worse for you if he does that).

If you want to bet, I agree that a smaller bet makes more sense. And probably folding to a raise if villain is passive. If villain is aggro, don't make block bets with the intention of folding cos they'll often turn some worse hands into bluffs.

But based on the results, we can safely conclude that this guy is extremely passive.

Thanks


Reply
Quote