Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

NL50 99 OTT play vs. nit.

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
189 Views
Yozan
Joined: 01.01.2010

$0.25/$0.50 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 4 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

BB: $51.66 (103.3 bb)
Hero (CO): $50.46 (100.9 bb)
BTN: $56.45 (112.9 bb)
SB: $66.55 (133.1 bb)

Preflop: Hero is CO with 9 9
Hero raises to $1.50, BTN calls $1.50, 2 folds

Flop: ($3.75) 6 5 8 (2 players)
Hero bets $2.81, BTN calls $2.81

Turn: ($9.37) Q (2 players)
Hero bets $5.68, BTN folds

BTN: 19/14 3b 3 AF 2.5, WTSD 20, 810hands.
fcbet 55, 67(3), Rcbet 10(10), BetvsMsCBet OTT (IP) 100(1)

- OTT we can turn our hand into a bluff vs TT-JJ;
- OTT we draw value vs 89,78,77, flushdraws.

on what rivers are we 3brl vs him?


Reply
Quote
1 reply
Coach
w34z3l
Joined: 03.08.2009

Originally posted by Yozan

- OTT we can turn our hand into a bluff vs TT-JJ;
- OTT we draw value vs 89,78,77, flushdraws.

on what rivers are we 3brl vs him?

Seems pretty reasonable.

You still have an ok bluffcatcher though, so check/call turn is fine. I think 2barreling will be +EV. You protect your equity, extract thin value, and occasionally fold out better.

Given that we expect opponents turn calling range to either be a strong made hand or a draw it may not necessarily make sense to fire too many rivers. We beat the draws and potentially have no fold-equity vs the made hands. So it would be a check/decide spot imo. With the weaker non-showdown hands in yoiur range I would think about 3barreling instead, busted FD's etc.


Reply
Quote
Share: