Nl100 - At

ok so I see a few problems with the hand...

1st. you say Villain:
Pretty much unknwn.

So with gutshot + overcard in 3bet pot i jus continue and see what happens personally. not a big deal if u want to delayed cbet but i think cbetting is better.

Then 2nd. once your delayed cbet gets raised and small.. you say So I thought it was random spazz or FDs.

Then why are you not 3betting your hand to protect your equity you have ace high and could be in trouble otherwise.

In this case given his 80bb stack size it makes it even easier to jam so go with your gut and put it all in on the turn.

1) Do u realize this is a great board for the caller? Would cbet ATs with bdfd and delayed with ATo.

2) I was thinking about that but when he's bluffing I believe it's better to call and let him bluff unless we think he's giving up on the river. It just looks unnatural to raise with a bluffcatcher you know

I don't see what do you beat on turn. he could call draws and
If he raises them he still has nice equity and you are pop have
To fold on so many bad cards. IMO you have so many better
Hands to defend.

good odds tho

Some good points in the thread already.

Probably would just cbet anyway. I get that it's a decent board for a standard pf calling range, but we have a gutshot + over, + no guarantee opponent is defending a logical range so we can expect to have some fold equity.

Readless I'm just folding the turn to raise. No need to hero call vs relative unknown imo. I disagree that he only reps 44, since stuff like QQ/JJ/AQ may check back the flop (regardless of whether they should bet. You said he's a bad reg right?).