Hi, so I've decided to give the SSS another try, since the first time I tried it it really did not work for me at all. I found myself bleeding away from blinds way too often, while waiting much too long for strong pre-flop hands. When I finally did get a hand, the table would fold to me and I'd gain nothing, and go back to bleeding blinds.
I realize that in such a short period of time, this is most likely due to bad luck with the big stacks simply having trash hands and not making mistakes.
In theory, the SSS does make sense to me, except for ONE rule that makes no sense at all. The articles state that I should only re-buy to 20 BB if my stack has fallen to 15 BB.
Currently, I'm playing NL10 so I buy-in for $2. Logically, I simply see no reason to let my stack fall to 1.50, when my entire strategy is hinging on the chance that I will push my stack all-in. If my stack is 1.50 instead of $2 when I finally do get a hand, I will only gain $1.50, instead of $2. That is a difference of 25% !!!
Over the course of thousands of hands, that 25% loss is going to add up to quite a bit of lost cash.
I see absolutely zero disadvantages to re-buying to $2.00 immediately after each round of blinds. This will ensure that when I finally do push all-in as the favourite, that I stand to gain the maximum amount of profit.
I have seen other people ask this question, and people have stated that SSS is most effective if you do not re-buy right away. However, they have given no explanation or math to support this rule.
Letting your stack fall to $1.50 seems completely unneccessary, and in my experience so far has caused me to lose a lot of money that I would have otherwise gained if my stack was kept at a constant $2.00.