Bigger11$ KK

Hi,

I would most likely bet 12k and see what they would do. I´m not comfortable c/c, so I would rather keep my initiative. If get called I would always check turn and evaluate turn/river

best regards,

Hi all,

MP1 looks like a reg so he has very very few Ax hands here. I think both betting, expecting to get value from MP1, or checking for pot control are both reasonable.

Vs 2 barrels from MP1, I'm not folding. If we check and UTG+1 leads turn, I call once and fold river.

Originally posted by chenny8888
Hi all,

MP1 looks like a reg so he has very very few Ax hands here. I think both betting, expecting to get value from MP1, or checking for pot control are both reasonable.

Vs 2 barrels from MP1, I'm not folding. If we check and UTG+1 leads turn, I call once and fold river.

like this prefer ch/flop vs 2 viilains cos utg imo can have a lot of Ax type of hands

note:imo if villain in MP bets flop and we call and he bets turn again i think folding is reasonable cos his most likely holdings would be set or smth like AQs/AK/AA
also i think is disgusting spot if we ch/ MP bets UTG calls (so we dont get in this ugly spot and put max presure on MP cbeting smthing like 30-40% pot should be ok with plan to ch turn and probably give up so depending how agro/fishy viilains r we can ch or cbet flop i think in higher bi i cbet here to put presure on other villains on lower bi i ch evaluate)

If flop goes we check, MP bets and UTG+1 calls, that's not an ugly spot. We can easily fold here expecting to be beat always on this dry board.

If we check MP bets and UTG+1 folds, we can generally call 2 barrels because we block AK, AQ is very rare given preflop action, and AA is also very rare combo wise. I'm fine calling down for the rare time MP turns a hand into a bluff, because his value is rarer.