Originally posted by ErikStenqvist
Hi, Erik!
Yes, I have problems in this area. But I have to formulate them first. I will write about it later.
Sounds good! When you are done just pm me here on the forums so I don't miss it 
Nice work!
Sorry for delay. I spent a lot of time to formulate this. But it still looks chaotically. Well, I think I have to post it anyway, because time is going and the end of this course is close... If something is unclear, I can explain this during discussion.
1. My first problem is that I can't play more than 4-6 usual tables (I mean classical tables, not zoom). The reason is that when the action begins at the same time at 3 or more tables, it's hard to me to concentrate on every hand and hold all this information in my head. I have to distract constantly to press the button on another table, otherwise I'll spend all timebank there and fall into 'sit out'. That is not good. I make many mistakes at such a moments... But when I play 4-6 tables, it becomes boring for me and I start playing very loose and make mistakes too... I mean that sometimes I need more time to make a decision. In these moments I fall to 'sit out' at other tables. But the most part of time I can make quick decisions and the game on a small amount of tables seems to me boring. May be that is the reason why I play zoom. Game speed there is more adaptive.
2. I can't choose a convenient arrangement for usual tables. When they are tiled, it's difficult to me to place my huge HUD so that it blocked nothing (for example, villain's stack, his nickname and the size of his bet or location of the button). In this layout figures in the HUD become too small and my eyes become tired very quickly. Besides, it's hard to me to hold in sight more than 4-6 tables. And I often fall to 'sit out' just because didn't notice that I have to make a move. I found more convenient layout: 4 tables in a tile, under them 4 more tables in a tile. But there is another problem. If the action occurs at two tables, located one below another, I can mix them and make a mistake. For example, at one table I received 88, behind another 66. I raised both. At the table where I have 88 everybody folded. But I didn't notice it. And with 66 I received a call and flop is 8TA. I can play 66 as a set of the eights just because it's in the same area of the screen where I just had 88. : rolleyes:
3. Probably for these 2 reasons I play zoom. But even in zoom it's difficult to me to play more than 2 tables. Because for making decisions I check a huge number of stats and notecaddy notes in popups. I try to consider everything: previous dynamics, timing tells, etc. I'm trying to get into villains mind, to feel, what he is planning to do. If I did this and lost, it's OK. But if I skipped some steps and made a mistake... I do not feel that its OK. It negatively affects my self-assessment.
I'd like to learn to make decisions more quickly. Because I have to spend more time to play the same number of hands which others regs can play much quicker. I'd like to learn to play at usual tables. Because I can select more profitable tables there. And I noticed that weak players are inclined to play there more loose. For example, the same fish can play 50/13 at usual tables and 30/13 in a zoom. So what do you think, where the regs earn more? But I was repeatedly convinced in practice that when I play more than 6 tables, I can only lose. 
And now for tilt... I have an old psychological problem. When I face with downstrike, I start doubting in profitability of my strategy. I begin to think that it does not work anymore... And now I'm just one more fish at the limit. At such a moments I need a confirmation that my decisions was correct. I do it for every decision, even for default lines. I lose ability to see the situation in the long term. I even start doubting in correctness of ranges which I give to opponents. I look for confirmation of the correctness of my decisions in the hand history, setting the similar line in HM2 filters for this opponent. I spend a lot of time doing this. And I am not confident in efficiency of such approach, because I do not move forward, but just convince myself that I am right.
Also, if the strike proceeds, I narrow my preflop ranges to reduce dispersion. And I also increase sizing of my bets and raises. I do this to not allow my villain to caught his outs. If I make villain to fold his hand or to go all-in with it before showdown, then my red and EV lines will look pretty good on the graphics - it helps me to convince myself in the correctness of my decisions. 
Now some words about my goals. As I already said, one month ago I was planning to beat NL100 till the end of this year. But now I feel that it will take more time... may be till the May 2014. And I'm not sure that I do enough for this purpose. I periodically analyze played hands and twice a week I discuss them with another NL25 regs, I watch video and I visit free trainings from pokerstrategy. What else can I do to accelerate my progress? Thank you in advance for answer.