Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

NL10 SH, ATo vs 3-bet

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
344 Views
dienaszaglis
Joined: 12.06.2008

$0.05/$0.10 No Limit Holdem
PokerStars
6 Players
Hand Conversion Powered by weaktight.com

Stacks:
UTG ($11.58) 116bb
UTG+1 ($10) 100bb
CO ($14.35) 144bb
HERO (BTN) ($10.45) 105bb
SB ($11.36) 114bb
BB ($10.67) 107bb 18/16, 3B@BB: 9(11), total: 12, 76h

Pre-Flop: ($0.15, 6 players) HERO is BTN A♥ 10:spade:
3 folds, HERO raises to $0.25, 1 fold, BB raises to $0.90, HERO?

I think, this is a reasonable spot to 4-bet bluff. Villain 3-bets quite a bit, and once in a while I can throw in some 4-bet bluffs with blocker(s).
How low his 3-bet% should be, that 4-bet bluffing becomes unprofitable? Less than 7% ?


Reply
Quote
1 reply
Alan883
Joined: 03.12.2008

Hey dienaszaglis,

AT is a hand that has blockers but also it is difficult to play it postflop because of domination problem. So you are right you can have AT in your 4bet bluffing range versus certain opponents. It is not only important how much they do 3bet but also how much do they fold to 4bets.


Reply
Quote