Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] FR .05/.10 QQ - Too agressive?

5 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
406 Views
Sutton
Joined: 14.09.2008

Known players:
keine.

0.05/0.1 Fixed-Limit Hold'em (8 handed)
Hand recorder used for this poker hand: PokerStrategy Elephant 0.60 by www.pokerstrategy.com.

Preflop: Hero is SB with Q♠, Q♣
4 folds, CO calls, BU calls, Hero raises, BB calls, CO calls, BU calls.

Flop: (8.00 SB) 8♦, A♣, T♣ (4 players)
Hero bets, 2 folds, BU calls.

Turn: (5.00 BB) 3♦ (2 players)
Hero bets, BU calls.

River: (7.00 BB) J♠ (2 players)
Hero checks, BU checks.

Final Pot: 7.00 BB

Results follow (highlight to see):
Hero shows a pair of queens (Qs Qc)
BU shows a pair of aces (Ks Ah)

BU wins with a pair of aces (Ks Ah)

I checked the river because I remembered that people like to limp Ax preflop. Should I have just checked the flop then called down/folded.


4 replies
shathur
Joined: 26.08.2008

I'v lost alredy much to much by calling qq, jj, and even kk when there was ace among social cards; now im presuading myself to fold it to any bet as soon as any ace become visible .


I like the flop and turn play. You have initiative and you should continue to bet and represent a strong hand.

I'm not sure about the river play...
I think I would play bet/fold as he may have called down with a draw and hit the jack on the river or maybe he has a T. Check/call is another option as you may induce a bluff from a busted draw.


I think we only have a valuebet vs some Tx hands here. I dont think he is going to call any 8x here and low PPs. I like to play check/call here to gain some extra bets vs busted flushdraws.


strat9
Joined: 06.02.2008

Shouldn't this have been check/fold on the flopwith no top-pair/overpair and four opponents?