Skip to forum
Search
Forums
Poker Forums
General Poker Discu...
Good/bad winrates a...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Good/bad winrates at mid and high stakes?

 
General Poker Discussion
Last Post by _Anonymous_ 13 years ago
7 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
3,373 Views
RSS
_Anonymous_
_Anonymous_
21.12.2013, 13:00

Kinda curious, if your playing somewhat mid high stakes such as NL100 or NL200 SH, what kind of winrate is considered 'good', 'avg', 'bad' etc?

Lets say NL100 or NL200 zoom... (SH)
Winrates: (for an avg reg who plays at least 4 zoom tables I'll assume)
2bb/100h
3.5bb/100h
5bb/100h
7bb/100h
9bb/100h

I stopped cash games for a long time but I think 9bb/100h is extremely good and not sure if its sustainable in long run. If I would guess, a solid winrate is around 5bb/100h? While most grinders/weaker regs have about 2bb/100h?

Also if your 4 tabling zoom SH, how many hands do you play per hour? I think around 1000 but not sure.


Reply
Quote
6 replies
NightFrostaSS
NightFrostaSS
Joined: 25.10.2008
Posts: 5,255
21.12.2013, 14:20

Think 3-4 is pretty good/above average. 5/6 crushing it. 7bb+ prob just a sick heater.

Haven't played FF in a while but think I get closer to 1.1k h/hr


Reply
Quote
_Anonymous_
_Anonymous_
21.12.2013, 18:28

Originally posted by NightFrostaSS
Think 3-4 is pretty good/above average. 5/6 crushing it. 7bb+ prob just a sick heater.

Haven't played FF in a while but think I get closer to 1.1k h/hr

Aight thanks, wanted to compare some cash game winrates vs my (hu)sng.

How much is the rakeback in bb/100h @ stars?


Reply
Quote
BrokesoBroke
BrokesoBroke
Joined: 23.10.2007
Posts: 883
23.12.2013, 04:50

850h/hr @ 200NL SH Zoom

IMO 5/6bb is very good for this stake. 7+ is beating it. :)


BrokeSoBroke

:skype: hai.truong79

Reply
Quote
pleno1
Coach
pleno1
Joined: 19.11.2010
Posts: 5,552
23.12.2013, 07:15

0bb- breakeven
1bb-3bb - reg with leaks
4-6bb v competent reg
7bb plus beast


Patrick Leonard
Ask me anything about 6max!

Reply
Quote
BrokesoBroke
BrokesoBroke
Joined: 23.10.2007
Posts: 883
24.12.2013, 19:13

6-7bb is fish is what Pleno is saying. ♦


BrokeSoBroke

:skype: hai.truong79

Reply
Quote
_Anonymous_
_Anonymous_
24.12.2013, 19:26

Thanks guys, having some issues calculating proper rakeback since the rb from cash games are huge I heard.

For now it feels like NL100 is slightly better than HUSNG $30
and NL200 is closer to HUSNG $100 due edges being less and less higher stakes.

For hypers:
0-1% roi = BE/horrible
2-3% = reg with leaks
4% = comp reg
5-6% = very comp reg
7%+ is crushing/not sustainable longrun


Reply
Quote
Forum Jump:
  Previous Topic
Next Topic