50bb/100 on NL2 and NL5

2k hands sample I did it too on full tillt one day at nl5. i was quite lucky run good. what was you're w$sd % mine was over 70 if i remember correctly. but couple of days later i couldnt win a single hand worth more than 1$ at nl10 in a session

try to do it over 10k sample that would be great

Yeah, it's just so good to see this sort of wr for some days in a row ♦

This year 8,5k hands on NL2/NL5, winrate of 41 bb/100 :coolface:

E: And for that sample won money at sd: 52 %. I'm just trying to exploit every villains' range as much as possible to take max value (by overbetting if necessary) and by bluffing only in spots where they are truly weak

That's all great, but please move up

If you beat NL5 like this you will crush nl10 also, I promise

Originally posted by FFRRAANNKKIIEE
That's all great, but please move up

I'm playing NL25

Oh then great missunderstood:)

Originally posted by CPallo

Originally posted by FFRRAANNKKIIEE
That's all great, but please move up

I'm playing NL25

Comeback please

Nice heater

Bravo CPallo.

While I dont think 50bb/100 is going to be sustainable over a reliable sample (lets say 100k+) I think high teens and possibly even 20bb/100 might be possible.

I say this because I have recently played 80k hands at NL5 and am winning at 13bb/100 and I am essentially not very good, have a lot to learn and that hand sample includes all sorts of spew and misplay and learning to multitable etc.

I think a more experienced player then I, capable of only playing when 'on song' could well hit 20/100+
Though there is little insentive to do so as, as FFRRAANNKKIIEE points out, they should probably just move up.

What is the extent of your challenge? Just dabbling about or are going to push for 'max winrate' over solid sample?

MD

Originally posted by MasochisticDesire
Bravo CPallo.

While I dont think 50bb/100 is going to be sustainable over a reliable sample (lets say 100k+) I think high teens and possibly even 20bb/100 might be possible.

I say this because I have recently played 80k hands at NL5 and am winning at 13bb/100 and I am essentially not very good, have a lot to learn and that hand sample includes all sorts of spew and misplay and learning to multitable etc.

I think a more experienced player then I, capable of only playing when 'on song' could well hit 20/100+
Though there is little insentive to do so as, as FFRRAANNKKIIEE points out, they should probably just move up.

What is the extent of your challenge? Just dabbling about or are going to push for 'max winrate' over solid sample?

MD

check out xflix blog and ull see that 20bb/100 ++ is definitely possible! and even on higher stakes

Originally posted by vuciitis
check out xflix blog and ull see that 20bb/100 ++ is definitely possible! and even on higher stakes

Yeah, I saw the first season, got some catching up to do.
Evidently he typically plays midstakes, how many hands played at NL5?

MD

Nice graph lmao. Rootin for you!

There's no player with a 50bb/100 wr over a decent sample of hands (200k, 300k+). It's just not possible.
You would have to play constantly every hand against a whale that shoves 72 ♦

Even if it was possible you should play a higher limit more profitable in money terms than if you get that kind of of sick bb/100 at a NL2 or NL5.

My winrate at 5NL zoom is a 100 times better. I sell coaching by the way. My rate is $500/hr (the same as my hourly at NL5).

It's really great nsavov, but you haven't answered the paramount question : did you accomplish this by thoughts alone ?
And you are losing at NL2 so no coaching for me thank you

NL2 is fishy, I moved up to where they respect my raises.

LOL, but based on 4 hands everyone can do that