Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

NL100 AQo river bluff

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
22 Views
duder1n0
Joined: 07.07.2009

Poker Stars, $0.50/$1 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 6 Players

BTN: $114.61 (114.6 bb)
SB: $153.71 (153.7 bb)
BB: $104.76 (104.8 bb)
UTG: $68.70 (68.7 bb)
Hero (MP): $117.75 (117.8 bb)
CO: $115.36 (115.4 bb)

Preflop: Hero is MP with A Q
UTG folds, Hero raises to $3, 2 folds, SB calls $2.50, BB folds

Flop: ($7) 4 Q K (2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks

Turn: ($7) 4 (2 players)
SB bets $6.50, Hero calls $6.50

River: ($20) 5 (2 players)
SB bets $12.50, Hero raises to $38.50,

SB 26/20/8.8 after 3.1k hands
SB vs MP coldcall 6%
SB vs MP 3bet 6%
bet turn oop vs missed flop cbet 46
AFq F/T/R 34/30/28
bet river 32
wtsd/w$sd/wwsf 28/59/49

BB was fishy, so I guess SB could coldcall here wider than usual, also probably calling AK as well to keep the fish in the pot.

I have a decent flop checking range overall (only cbetting ~50%), but I'm not sure if he is considering that.

Flop/turn are pretty standard I guess.
On the river I think he has AK/KJs/KTs in his range, but I dont think he would valuebet worse Qx than mine, so I didnt want to call, but rather turn my hand into bluff.
I have the nutflush blocker, also blocking QQ/KQ/AK somewhat. Downside is that I dont rep much beside runner-runner flush, but I have that in my range, checking some A:hX:h on the flop.


Reply
Quote
1 reply
mbml
Joined: 27.11.2008

This is such a strong bluff catcher. I see no reason to turn it into a bluff.

Sure you have the blocker which makes bluffing good but at the same time it also increases the strength of your bluff catcher.

Besides, the blocker doesn't really help you in repping the nut flush. You would never play the nut flush this way (you would have bet the Flop with a hand like A:h9:h)


Reply
Quote