Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

PLO50 SBvsBB Cbet? AQJ7ss on 975

5 Posts
5 Users
0 Reactions
609 Views
MGF001
Joined: 25.05.2007

Villain plays 54/3 on 35 hands; AF 2.3; WTS 30

Poker Stars, $0.25/$0.50 Pot Limit Omaha Cash, 5 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

BTN: $51.75 (103.5 bb)
Hero (SB): $68.84 (137.7 bb)
BB: $57.28 (114.6 bb)
MP: $60.06 (120.1 bb)
CO: $50.04 (100.1 bb)

Preflop: Hero is SB with A 7 J Q
3 folds, Hero raises to $1.50, BB calls $1

Flop: ($3) 7 9 5 (2 players)
Hero checks, BB bets $2.86, Hero calls $2.86

Turn: ($8.72) A (2 players)
Hero checks, BB bets $5, Hero calls $5

River: ($18.72) 4 (2 players)
Hero checks, BB checks

FLOP: Cbet or ch/c?
This Villain seems to be kind of a station, so a cbet would be better here, I think.

ch/c is something against a more aggressive/bluffy villain and I think this would be a good situation for it, if this would be such a Villain.

Would you agree to this thoughts?

Regards MGF


Reply
Quote
4 replies
Gothicrow
Joined: 15.11.2010

Hi MGF001

Yeah I would cbet flop and this turn, then ch/f river against a passive player.

I'm not sure about a ch/c against an aggressive player, because would be hard for you to play this hand against 3 barrels (what an aggressive player should do often after you check flop). I guess I would cbet it too and fold without reads if he raises, or do something else if I know a player raises often on this boards, like call flop ch/raise turn, or re-raise flop.

Regards


Reply
Quote
Suhepxm
Joined: 20.10.2008

Originally posted by Gothicrow
I would cbet flop and this turn, then ch/f river against a passive player.

I'm not sure about a ch/c against an aggressive player, because would be hard for you to play this hand against 3 barrels (what an aggressive player should do often after you check flop). I guess I would cbet it too and fold without reads if he raises, or do something else if I know a player raises often on this boards, like call flop ch/raise turn, or re-raise flop.

not much to add here, i dont like x/c here. Especially not vs an aggressive Villain.
i also wouldnt get too fancy and start bet/3betting bet/call x/r turn vs aggressive opponets with this kind of holding, there are much better hands to fight back :).

Every hand, even total air has decent equity against our hand and we are happy to make them fold by betting.

b/f > x/c imho


Reply
Quote
MrTrocks
Joined: 25.03.2006

Originally posted by Suhepxm

Originally posted by Gothicrow
I would cbet flop and this turn, then ch/f river against a passive player.

I'm not sure about a ch/c against an aggressive player, because would be hard for you to play this hand against 3 barrels (what an aggressive player should do often after you check flop). I guess I would cbet it too and fold without reads if he raises, or do something else if I know a player raises often on this boards, like call flop ch/raise turn, or re-raise flop.

not much to add here, i dont like x/c here. Especially not vs an aggressive Villain.
i also wouldnt get too fancy and start bet/3betting bet/call x/r turn vs aggressive opponets with this kind of holding, there are much better hands to fight back :).

Every hand, even total air has decent equity against our hand and we are happy to make them fold by betting.

b/f > x/c imho

jap :f_biggrin:


Reply
Quote
Skodljivec
Joined: 17.12.2011

Hi,

pretty much agree with the previous posts, not much to add :)
you usually have to have a pretty good reason to c/c as the preflop agressor.
Regards,

Skod


Reply
Quote