Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

zoom, K4s cbet question

3 Posts
3 Users
0 Reactions
224 Views

$0.25/$0.50 No Limit Holdem

Stacks:
UTG Player4 ($46.11) 92bb
UTG+1 Player5 ($61.76) 124bb
CO Player6 ($138.84) 278bb
BTN gAsheks ($52.30) 105bb
SB Player2 ($65.21) 130bb
BB Player3 ($50) 100bb

Pre-Flop: ($0.75, 6 players) gAsheks is BTN
3 folds, gAsheks raises to $1.25, 1 fold, Player3 calls $0.75

Flop: ($2.75, 2 players)
Player3 checks,

Small info on villain:

Spoiler

So question is about cbeting. Should we? If so whats our plan for later streets?

Also what would be the worst holdings we should cbet on this board texture which doesn't connect with it?


Reply
Quote
2 replies
jules97
Joined: 10.06.2012

This hand fits into, bet once unless unimproved, for me. It doesn't miss the flop completely. It still has one over, which is good most of the time and also has a bd/fd to the 2nd nuts.

I'd cbet on this flop, most of middlepair + and then like probably 90% of things like gutshots, fd's, bd/fd's (which is quite big coz of one card bd/fd's) and then a few things like KT, Q7 that have a decent chance to pick up equity and can barrel about half of turn cards. This would be around about 65% which is pretty high for me, mainly coz I want to deny equity and not give free cards to villains overcards with my 8x, 9x hands. There's no need to bet stuff like K6o.


Reply
Quote
cutegoldfish
Joined: 19.11.2009

Hi,

yes we should CB with this hand. why?

we should be cbbeting around 65% here and that means all

overpairs TT+
top pair 9x
2nd pair 8x
straight draws 67 TJ
gutshots JQ TQ etc
backdoor flush draw (2diamonds)
flush draws (2 clubs)

and this hand we have falls under backdoor flush draw. we want to bet hands that can pick up good equity with the potential of making nuts by the river.

if we get called we bet on cards that weaken his range, or strengthen ours, for example QKA, or our flush draw. and cards that strengthen his range we check or example 67 TJ 89

Thanks
Xavierfok


Reply
Quote
Share: