SQZ OOP against 2 fishes

I don't know for sure, but I would probably just call being OOP in SB and then evaluate the flop. Which would mean that you didn't inflate the pot unnecessarily and you still have high enough SPR to just fold and try again next hand. What do you think about this?

I think sqz is fine, but i d probably cf flop

I would just call preflop without any reads/info on opponents. Squeeze doesn't work as squeeze in microplo, as you don't really have preflop folding equity. It should be called "let's make big 3way pot where I am oop!".

On the flop just check-fold. You totally miss the board and you don't have enough folding equity to make a pure bluff.

People should have a low fold to 3-bet stat. Squeezing with this hand isn't bad. All options but fold are good.

Save yourself money on the turn for sure. Never getting a fold laying > 3:1

Easy call pre, don't like 3b OOP check/fold on flop, as played, c/f flop, seems like a spew to me to cb that board with your holding.. I don't see 2 fold here very much.

Why are you committed to the pot? SPR is low vs one guy but vs the other guy you still had around $6.51 or around 65bb remaining for turnplay. You totally wiffed the flop, the SPR <1 thing is true for Aces but you did not have Aces you had no pair no draw in a 3way floppot with still (if you add flop and turn) 100bb behind vs MP.

Originally posted by FlyingDutchm1n
Why are you committed to the pot? SPR is low vs one guy but vs the other guy you still had around $6.51 or around 65bb remaining for turnplay. You totally wiffed the flop, the SPR <1 thing is true for Aces but you did not have Aces you had no pair no draw in a 3way floppot with still (if you add flop and turn) 100bb behind vs MP.

this post is like 2 yrs old, so I think the originator will not answer. But +1 ♦

You totally missed the flop and got in way too deep a favorite habit of mine as well.