Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

AKs donk turn paired

4 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
34 Views
GingerKid
Joined: 05.08.2007

partypoker - $1 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 6 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BTN: 130.06 BB (VPIP: 25.86, PFR: 17.03, 3Bet Preflop: 5.28, Hands: 3,671)
SB: 255.52 BB (VPIP: 24.88, PFR: 18.48, 3Bet Preflop: 7.00, Hands: 5,999)
Hero (BB): 143.85 BB
UTG: 145.71 BB (VPIP: 23.16, PFR: 19.28, 3Bet Preflop: 7.12, Hands: 3,426)
MP: 39 BB (VPIP: 23.83, PFR: 18.13, 3Bet Preflop: 6.16, Hands: 4,904)
CO: 235.86 BB (VPIP: 20.83, PFR: 16.02, 3Bet Preflop: 6.56, Hands: 7,013)

SB posts SB 0.5 BB, Hero posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has A♠ K♠

UTG raises to 3 BB, fold, fold, fold, fold, Hero calls 2 BB

Flop: (6.5 BB, 2 players) A♥ T♦ 8♣
Hero checks, UTG bets 4 BB, Hero calls 4 BB

Turn: (14.5 BB, 2 players) T♣
Hero bets 6 BB, UTG calls 6 BB

River: (26.5 BB, 2 players) 4♣
Hero bets 8.39 BB, fold

Spoiler

Hero wins 33.57 BB

standard reg. ok to donk turn with AK+ hands, because my range becomes much stronger? I would donk AK 33% pot because he will pot control worse Ax, and freeroll equity, and to donk pot Tx and some GS


Reply
Quote
3 replies
serverm07
Joined: 08.08.2012

Are you talking about your turn sizing or river sizing with 33% and pot?


Reply
Quote
GingerKid
Joined: 05.08.2007

Originally posted by serverm07
Are you talking about your turn sizing or river sizing with 33% and pot?

I would donk turn 33% AK and some GS, and pot Tx and some GS. On river plan was to bet 3/4 on blank with AK,
but since flush completed I think betting small will yield higher EV. With strong TX and FH I would overbet river, but on this card I would just pot it, and with weaker Tx I would bet the same as AK.


Reply
Quote
serverm07
Joined: 08.08.2012

I personally wouldn't split anything until river, it's not practical enough for me but if that's what you prefer go for it, just make sure your ranges make sense. These boards can be tricky because some people will just auto bet Tx as well so keep that in mind.


Reply
Quote