Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

22 set donk 3way vs big raise deep

2 Posts
2 Users
0 Reactions
102 Views
GingerKid
Joined: 05.08.2007

partypoker - $0.50 NL FAST (6 max) - Holdem - 5 players
Hand converted by PokerTracker 4

BTN: 229.46 BB (VPIP: 21.68, PFR: 17.03, 3Bet Preflop: 5.83, Hands: 6,946)
SB: 326.92 BB (VPIP: 22.29, PFR: 18.12, 3Bet Preflop: 7.86, Hands: 911)
BB: 100 BB (VPIP: 19.53, PFR: 13.31, 3Bet Preflop: 10.56, Hands: 343)
Hero (UTG): 650.88 BB
CO: 113.96 BB (VPIP: 76.00, PFR: 12.00, 3Bet Preflop: 7.89, Hands: 75)

SB posts SB 0.5 BB, BB posts BB 1 BB

Pre Flop: (pot: 1.5 BB) Hero has 2♥ 2♦

Hero raises to 3 BB, CO calls 3 BB, BTN raises to 11.1 BB, fold, fold, Hero calls 8.1 BB, CO calls 8.1 BB

Flop: (34.8 BB, 3 players) K♦ 2♠ Q♥
Hero bets 24.78 BB, fold, BTN raises to 74.5 BB, Hero calls 49.72 BB

Turn: (183.8 BB, 2 players) 8♥
Hero checks, BTN bets 143.86 BB and is all-in, Hero calls 143.86 BB

River: (471.52 BB, 2 players) Q♦

Spoiler

Hero shows 2♥ 2♦ (Full House, Twos full of Queens)
(Pre 18%, Flop 4%, Turn 2%)
BTN shows K♠ K♥ (Full House, Kings full of Queens)
(Pre 82%, Flop 96%, Turn 98%)
BTN wins 465.52 BB

sqeeze 5%.
i donk, because I dont want to let pot control, also it looks weaker than cr?

when he raises so big, it is sick, he reps KK, QQ. Do you think he would raise KQ considering that I might have 22? especailly so big and then shove?


Reply
Quote
1 reply
Coach
w34z3l
Joined: 03.08.2009

Hey GingerKid,

I guess calling pf is fine due to the stack depth, although we certainly have to be somewhat cautious postflop if we hit for set-over-set reasons. This is actually one reason why it's ok for us to find a fold preflop despite the stack depth.

Flop lead is fine, although I'd tend towards keeping the sizing small here for the reasons discussed above.

I think turn could potentially be an overplay here. I really doubt he has that many bluffs in his range given the action + he probably doesn't play worse for value frequently enough. We might even be able to find a fold here.


Reply
Quote