66 BVB NL50sh

Turn cbet 33%? (/3times)?

So you are meaking an exploitative play here by calling the 3bet and expecting villain to shutdown with his bluffs on the turn often? I think your samplesize is too small to do it. I think 66 has poor playability postflop OOP in a 3bet pot so I think folding to the 3bet pre is standard. Not sure about turn, depends a lot on villains barreling tendencies anyhow we are here w. a weak hand and have a lot better hands to call down so I would fold.

If it is too weak to call, is it better to 4 bet then?

If villain folds too much to 4bets then maybe but I don't see what's the problem w. raise - folding. Also if villain 3bet's a ton from BB we can consider using a limping strategy from sb.

66 is a great card to 4bet bluff an aggressive 3bettor (especially on blind battles, and OOP).
If you call to set mine, should make a disciplined fold on the flop (also especially cause you are OOP, and it would be quite impossible to reach the showdown cheaply).
Although, in this particular scenario, calling one time is not the worst decision (villain seems to give up on the turn sometimes).

Hi Mysteryman,

66 has really no blockers to be a great 4-bet hand and you are close to make calls in equity based on what you think villain stacks off with. If he actually 5-bets TT+, AQ+ in these positions you have about 37% equity. How much do you actually need? Well it depends on your 4-bet but it would be really close.

I can see shoving 66 vs a 4-bet when villain is aggro and 4-bet/folds a lot but 4-betting with it doesn't seem great at all

As played just fold the flop. You rarely get anywhere with this hand and have just 2 cards that can actually improve you.