Skip to forum
Notifications
Clear all

FR, full house vs overbet

4 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
763 Views
Zanardi1
Joined: 04.01.2010

Pacific, $0.02/$0.04 No Limit Hold'em Cash, 7 Players
Poker Tools Powered By Holdem Manager - The Ultimate Poker Software Suite.

SB: $4.83 (120.8 bb)
Hero (BB): $4.37 (109.3 bb)
MP1: $3.12 (78 bb)
MP2: $4.01 (100.2 bb)
MP3: $5.37 (134.3 bb)
CO: $7.04 (176 bb)
BTN: $6.05 (151.3 bb)

Preflop: Hero is BB with K Q
5 folds, SB completes, Hero raises to $0.16, SB calls $0.12

Flop: ($0.32) Q 2 A (2 players)
SB checks, Hero bets $0.20, SB calls $0.20

Turn: ($0.72) A (2 players)
SB checks, Hero checks

River: ($0.72) A (2 players)
SB bets $0.80, Hero folds

Results: $0.72 pot ($0.04 rake)
Final Board: Q 2 A A A
SB mucked and won $0.68 ($0.32 net)
Hero mucked K Q and lost (-$0.36 net)

The villain is a recreational player. 46/14 from 78 hands, 2.8 global AF.

Preflop - standard.

On the flop I cbet to attack the drawing part of his range. He calls, so this means that he has the :club: draw, or an ace.

The turn brings the flush, so I check back.

On the river, he overbets. And gets me thinking: does he have a flush and ignores the fact that there are three aces down, or does he have the fourth one and he value bets me with quads? I know that there is a lower chance of him showing me quads, but his story is consistent. To reduce variance, I let him have the pot.


Reply
Quote
3 replies
nitrol
Joined: 24.07.2010

Push.


Reply
Quote
la55i
Joined: 27.01.2013

Most likely we have the best hand here. If you want to reduce variance just call. I would never fold here.


Reply
Quote

Hi Zanardi,

Raising river doesn't really make sense. Worse doesn't pot/overbet to call a shove.

But calling is g ood as a bluffcatcher/split pot.


Reply
Quote
Share: