2 pair in a 3bet pot with a straight on the board

Depends on villain but most of the time I don't think we have 3 streets of value here. Flop hits his rage very well and I like to bet flop and turn for value from AQ, AT,JT, QJ, maybe QT, KJ. On the river only 2pair combos may call you. If he was very tricky, able to double float with some equity, aggressive on the river than x/c river could make sense, but most of the time this is x/f river.

I think it is fine as played. Although i wouldnt squeeze PF in this spot. If it was offsuit i would squeeze.

Squeezing for value is fine imo given the positions.

I think bet bet x/f is ridiculous line. AJ is clearly strong enough to triple barrel for value here.

Originally posted by metza
Squeezing for value is fine imo given the positions.

I think bet bet x/f is ridiculous line. AJ is clearly strong enough to triple barrel for value here.

What is his calling rannge on the river then?

Equity Win Tie
SB 47.62% 42.86% 4.76% AcJc
BB 52.38% 47.62% 4.76% JJ-TT, AQs-ATs, A5s-A4s, KQs, AQo-ATo, KQo

I understand why it seems like it is xf when we are beat a bit more than half the time. Also we have no info. He may cry call tp average kicker getting 3:1

Usually we need to have >50% equity to value bet with higher ev than check but this is only applied IP.

EV of jamming is imo higher than x/f, since EV of xf is 0 when he bet river, and I dunno that he check back too often. Because we put in 5.57 and on average get 0.47*22.18 = 10.42 back, the EV of jamming is likely higher than checking unless he check back very often on river. But as you see he has all these strong hands in his range, I don't think it happens enough to compensate for our xf.

Maybe you are right This range looks ok, but I don't think I would call here 3 streets with AQ, ATo doesn't play well in 3bet pots, so I guess it's not always here and JJ - I sometimes 4bet them vs sqz.