NL16 SH 33

I believe he would bet Ax on the flop, so this turn play really looks like AA, 55 or KK. I don't see him raising flushdraws like that. I would also fold.

After flop goes check-check, why don't we lead the turn?

Originally posted by nitrol
After flop goes check-check, why don't we lead the turn?

You are right! I didn't notice that! Leading would probably be the best play there.

what?
1/ why you did call such a baby pocket preflop?
2/ as you played I gonna call him down on the turn and every blanc river all day and I gonna by very happy about the result:)

Originally posted by vengeance77
what?
1/ why you did call such a baby pocket preflop?

I would say that it's standard BB vs BTN, especially vs a minraise.

I don't know whether you are happy or sad but with SD and FD on board and no action on flop we have to start building the pot.

Originally posted by nitrol
I don't know whether you are happy or sad but with SD and FD on board and no action on flop we have to start building the pot.

As I said, I agree with leading the turn. Not sure what to do if he raise, though. I guess we could fold.

We could play according to odds.

Originally posted by nitrol
We could play according to odds.

So, we have 10 clean outs, which gives us a guaranteed equity of 21,74%. If he raises 3x, we will have pot odds of 30,46%. Considering he might have some bluffs and value hands which are worse than ours (two pairs, maybe one pair) in his range, I believe our equity is probably even higher than that, so the call should be a decent option.

Yes, that is the plan.

i heavily disagree with that range. highly doubt QQ-JJ, Ax, KQs are hands that could realistically be played this way