this is very small sample size, but results are intriguing.
what do you think?
btw, both is NL50
I dont get it.
Are that SSS or BSS results?
Btw, what you have is not even a sample size, its 3 sessions - 1 breakeven, 1 losing and then 1 winning one.
the breakeven part is SSS, and then the losing part before upswing is start of BSS
You can't choose based on a graph. Make your mind up what you wanna reach and what suits you more.
Best regards,
TribunCaesar
Just goto comment (always love these comparison thing)
With SSS you make money but don't learn a lot.
The best quote I got for this (translated from a German article not related to this site)
"Playing SSS is like wanting to learn how to be a auto mechanic but then stopping when you know how to change the oil"
You will seriously never learn poker if you just stick to SSS.
Not wanting to flame anyone... but sooner or later, you have to switch.
The only thing you can tell by that graph is that playing BSS you won 13 big hands and lost 5. 18 hands is nowhere near enough information to make a decision.
I agree with Dragar, SSS will make you profits in the short term but if you want to get serious in the long run you have to switch sometime.
If you switch from SSS to BSS you have to fully commit yourself to it and get SSS right out of your system, dont get stuck in between.