Skip to forum
3rd party Starting ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

[Closed] 3rd party Starting Hand Chart

5 Posts
4 Users
0 Reactions
5,010 Views
opal99
Joined: 05.02.2008

I found this while looking for some nice wallpapers (i know it sounds strange ;)), but I'm too tired to think about it more deeply atm. What do you think about it? It can be somehow too straightforward but it wasn't made for micro SH so it expects reasonable opponents.

Starting hand chart Key
R = Raise
C = Call
CK = Check
3B = 3bet
R1 = raise first in, call 1 or more limpers
C2 = call if 2 or more put money in pot
RF = raise if first in, fold otherwise
3B2 = 3bet lone LAG or CO, call 2 or more
LR = limp vs loose opponents (raise if they CC), raise tight opponents
CA = call LAG blind stealer
RT = raise tight players first in, fold otherwise
RL = raise first in or 1 limper, call or check otherwise
R2L = raise first in or 2 limpers, call or check otherwise
RP = Raise Passive/Predictable game. Less SemiBluffing.
C-P = Call in passive game or where u expect to encourage limpers
RL-TB - Raise Limper, Tight Blinds…otherwise limp (workable, and possibly off though)
Rbt/RBT = Raise BTN 40%VPIP or less and BB 50% or less

Disclaimer: Don't use it before someone skilled checks it out!


4 replies
Alafoe
Joined: 28.08.2008

I will try it during my next click


Ka0s
Joined: 05.11.2008

3rd Party ?? Blasphemy !!

No, but really ...
I'm not gonna comment on the hands and actions on it. But I like the idea behind the layout. I've been thinking myself about the bronze charts and how they could be more compact / easier to use. It could very well be my slow mind, but it takes a little search sometimes. So I like the idea of putting everything into one chart, and using colors to make things more clear.

Nice wallpaper ;)


I have no motivation to take a deeper look at it. Way to complicated. ;)
Well I'm just too lazy.

Our first SHC looked like this chart but was found to be to confusing for beginners and not exact enough for better players.

It isn't that exactly as our ORC and the other charts based on it as it doesn't go with the VPIP and PFR except for dividing between loose/passive/aggressive/etc..


opal99
Joined: 05.02.2008

Originally posted by ciRith
I have no motivation to take a deeper look at it. Way to complicated. ;)
Well I'm just too lazy.

exactly what I was thinking - that's why I posted it here (with hope someone will take a closer loook)