Thought process review in an OESD

I might not be a much more experienced player than the OP, but some thoughts:

Pre-flop is completely OK. Despite two connectors, the flop is otherwise quite dry so raising looks a bit odd. However, so does the min-bet by SB, but because of a cheap price to see the next card I'd just call. This also gives CO good odds to call, but I think we should not be too scared about that, because if we make the straight, it's the best possible. Despite the weak looking min-bet, the opponent decides to call the raise. On the turn you do not improve. Double barreling OESDs is normally good but I don't know if you have enough fold equity to execute it now. After having seen how the hand played out on the river, it looks like the opponent tried to check-raise.

River completes the straight but paired board makes full houses possible so you do not have the nuts. I'd also raise the river, because Qx will still call, but then SB decides to re-raise... for a minimum again. Having seen two min-bets in a same hand makes me think that the opponent is not too good and due to a good price we get by calling, I'd call. 55 and 44 beat us and I might play them like this (well, except for the bet sizing), but that is not the case very often.

I agree that we cannot raise preflop with this hand. Checking is fine. On the flop I would rather call. We have a good draw and we don't hate to be multi-way for the better implied odds. I also don't expect to have enough fold equity against the SB. As played, I don't think we will have a fold equity on the turn, either, so I like checking. I like the raise on the river, but when he 3bets, I think we have to call because we don't have the nuts.

If we just call we are left with $0.56.

Originally posted by nitrol
If we just call we are left with $0.56.

But that's $0,56 we will most likelly invest unprofitably, I believe, and since it's NL2, that's 1/4 of buy-in.

Yeah, but I don't see what hands beat us, besides QQ, and for the check on the turn I guess he didn't have it.

EDIT: Nevermind, forgot about Q8, Q5, Q4

On the flop, I can see why I should have called here (small pots for small hands, big pots for big hands), I guess there is no discussion.
However, for the sake of argument, I'll ask: Is there anything to be gained by raising?
for example, If I raise and he calls, I can eliminate most pocket pairs from his range (TT-22). Is that information worth the money of the raise?

Anyway, thanks for the great feedback, and for reading the wall of text containing mostly noob talk, I really appreciate it.

Anyway, it can be a good play to call the 3B.

Preflop OK. Flop I prefer call 3way. T OK.

River just call his 3bet. By 4beting you usually isolate to stronger range. I can imagine that river shove can be not so terrible mistake vs fish who call all trips (still not happy to do it) but vs solid even microstake player it´s a big overplay.

So, by 3-betting, if I give him credit, he is telling me that he has a hand better than a set, right?
Now that I think of it, it makes perfect sense, since I would not 3-Bet with set on that board, if I were him.

Thanks for the feedback I find that just one deep analysis like this gives me more info than 5 random hands posted with no commentary.